In Defense of Religious Freedom

The following is a letter sent by Florida CD 2 Congressman Steve Southerland.

From: “Representative Steve Southerland” <FL02SSIMA@mail.house.gov>
Date: February 16, 2012 3:00:29 PM CST
Subject: A Message from Rep. Southerland in Defense of Religious Freedom

February 16, 2012

Dear Friend:
As you have undoubtedly heard on the evening news or read in the local paper, the Obama Administration’s attempt to require faith-based charities, schools, and hospitals to offer contraceptive care has ignited an intense debate about religious liberty in America.  As a man of faith, I wanted to take this opportunity to update you and share my perspective on this very important issue.

In an effort the quell public outcry over their contraceptive mandate, the Obama Administration attempted to offer a compromise that allowed employees to receive benefits for contraceptive care directly from their insurance company, rather than the religious organization that employs them.  I stand side-by-side with the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops and others who have fought back, asserting that this is no solution at all.  This proposal does nothing to satisfy the concerns of the American people on this deeply personal issue, and it does nothing to actually protect our rights of conscience.

As Congress considers measures to protect religious organizations from the dictates of Washington bureaucrats, I cosponsored H.R. 1179, the Respect for Rights of Conscience Act.  This important piece of legislation would ensure that religious organizations, charities, and clinics will not have to provide contraceptive care if it violates their spiritual mission.

I, along with several of my House colleagues, sent letters to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) urging the agency to repeal this clear violation of our God-given and constitutionally-mandated right to religious freedom and to the House Budget Committee requesting that no funding be approved for implementing or enforcing the HHS rule.

I am humbled and honored to have the opportunity to represent you in the United States House of Representatives.  If you would like to follow the latest developments on this important issue, please visit http://southerland.house.gov and sign up for our e-newsletter.

Sincerely,

Steve Southerland, II

United States Representative

 

Now my response to the Hon. Mr Southerland

While I commend and support you in your efforts to squelch the attempts of the Obama Administration to invade the religious arena with your cosponsorship of H.R. 1179, the Respect for Rights of Conscience Act.  You are not addressing the issue in the proper manner and why are you creating yet another piece of unnecessary legislation.  How does Obama think he can compromise the first amendment of the constitution?

(Amendment 1 U.S. Constitution… Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.)  Which is exactly what this administration is trying to do.

THAT should be your basic fight in this matter!  No Laws…. it says it right there in the Constitution and you’re sponsoring more laws.  And although your measure is in support of the Constitution, do we need more laws that in effect say, follow the Constitution.

Thanks for your efforts, now lets focus and fight the root issue without creating more laws.  We have enough laws already….Republicanism  has as a fundamental tenet, that being smaller government, that also means less laws.

 

6 thoughts on “In Defense of Religious Freedom

  1. Simple question: why wouldn’t the Congress TELL that agency to repeal this instead of “ask” them to do so? The Constitution gives the authority to make law to Congress and Congress ONLY! When the executive starts to do it in the form of “regulation,” you have laid low the Constitution and erected a dictatorship.

    While I am somewhat pleased to see Southerland at least appearing to be on the correct side of this issue, I am greatly disappointed that he understands so little about how our govt. is supposed to function. he needed “ask” the executive to do anything if we’re talking about something that has the force of law, he should tell. That’s the whole point of the separation of power and the reason the legislature is set closest to the People.

    But then, I’m told I do not understand the Constitution….as WILSON put in place.

    (Thanks, HD, good post)

  2. I agree with all 3, Southerland, hockey dad and b3a…………. If Congress wants to enact a new law, it should address the illegality of what the OWEbozo regime is doing to our Constitution.

  3. How does Obama think he can compromise the first amendment of the constitution?

    Not only that, but how does Obama think that e can just mandate :

    1 A company provide a product or service?
    2. That a company provide a service for free?

    Even IF you feel it’s okay to use contraception he just can’t do this.

Talk Amongst Yourselves:

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s