This is probably the most important post I have ever written. No matter how busy you are, if you value your individual rights and liberty, you must read this post – ALL OF IT! And no matter what you do, watch the video clip at the end of this post – ALL OF IT!
Rules For Radicals
“Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history (and who is to know where mythology leaves off and history begins — or which is which), the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom — Lucifer
So who is Saul Alinsky? In short, he was a Marxist who tried to teach people how to over throw our government so as to allow the establishment of Communism. Lest you have any doubt of my word, this is from the 1st paragraph of his book, Rules for Radicals:
“What follows is for those who want to change the world from what it is to what they believe it should be. The Prince was written by Machiavellie [for those who don’t know Machiavelli, think anything goes – as long as it gets you what you want] for the Haves on how to hold power. Rules for Radicals is written for the Have-Nots on how to take it away.” (p.1)
So you say that this does not mean he wants to establish Communism? Keep reading. From page 10 – and in context:
“My aim here is to suggest how to organize for power: how to get it and use it. I will argue that the failure to use power for a more equitable distribution of the means of life for all people signals the end of the revolution and the start of the counterrevolution.”
In other words, Alinsky is all about seizing power to redistribute wealth – COMMUNISM!
But there is more. Alinsky does not believe in any objective truth or reality. Also from page 10:
“All life is partisan. There is no dispassionate objectivity.”
It may not be readily apparent, but if you read enough of the stuff that people like Alinsky write to and for each other’s consumption, you will understand that there is a parallel between those words and these:
“The Party is not interested in the overt act. The thought is all we care about.”
And if you understand post-modernism, you will not only see it in both those quotes, you will understand why Utah so vehemently rejects it as the non-sense that it is. Yet, men such as Alinsky and Obama have built their lives around such ideas, which is why the society they shape cannot function: because it is built on an idea that cannot exist in the objective reality that is this universe.
If you follow my posts, you may have read one of my many attacks on the notion of democracy. I know it to be a tool of the tyrant; a means by which the power of the State, through the media, can and does shape public opinion for the sole purpose of convincing the public to support the State in goals which are detrimental to the well being of the very people voting for them. Alinsky says essentially this on page 12:
“Democracy is not an end but the means toward achieving these values. This is my credo for which I live and, if need be, die.”
I ask you, if not for the purpose of making it easier to manipulate the people, then why push direct democracy when – if it is achieved – there can be no guarantee that the ends Alinsky desires will be achieved. If he is not sure that he and his allies will be able to manipulate and direct that voting body to do his bidding, why chance the volatility of direct democracy – essentially mob rule? Let’s let Joseph Goebbels explain it:
All totalitarians believe this to be true:
“It is the absolute right of the state to supervise the formation of public opinion.”
And you shape that opinion partially by:
“Not every item of news should be published. Rather must those who control news policies endeavor to make every item of news serve a certain purpose.”
Finally, you create a “crisis” – just as Alinsky says — for the purpose of:
“The war made possible for us the solution of a whole series of problems that could never have been solved in normal times.”
Does Obama advisor, Rahm Emanuel’s word make more sense to you yet?
If you’d like to learn more about the connections between Alinsky and Obama, you can start by watching this video. This man is reporting the truth about Alinksy, and you can prove it to yourself – if you’ll bother to take the time. By the way, around the 2:30 mark, the speaker will explain what where the Obama/Van Jones/Alinsky “Bottom up, Top Down, Inside Out” approach to revolution Glenn Beck has been trying to tell us is being used to topple our government by Glenn Beck (the talk show host this speaker mentions):
I beg you, please learn about the people who are currently in control of our government, our media and our schools. Theirs is an ideology at war with the ideals and principles upon which this nation was founded. Theirs is a mindset at war with the individual rights and liberty of Man. Theirs is an ideology which – no matter how well intentioned – destroys the souls of men and leads to tyranny and darkness. Many of my posts are all connected to the plans these people have. This is a giant conspiracy, but it has all been done out in the open. They have been telling us for years what they plan to do and how, but we have been too busy chasing squirrels. Now, we’re out of time!
This is not hyperbole, this is an historical pattern of fact. Please, hear my plea - WAKE UP — WAKE UP BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE!