Here’s the story:
“What sets us apart is that we care not only about ourselves and our immediate circle, but about others as well,” she said. “Today we’re setting a new standard for equality and legality.”
Keeping in mind that I have chosen this story because it also reflects the ideological claims of all Statists everywhere, here’s my question:
How does one go about insuring Tiger Woods has the liberty to play in the Masters’ while enforcing equality of outcome for all the other players?
I know that the first objections the Statists who read this will have is to claim that my example is different, but it isn’t. None of us is born equal in our talents and abilities: the only equality that is or ever will be possible is equality under the law – the very thing that Statists use this call for equality of outcome to oppose.
Remember, they don’t really care about others: they just want personal power and/or the government to take other peoples’ property and give it to them – period. Their claims of moral superiority are nothing more than a pathetic attempt to assuage any twinges of guilt they might happen to feel. It is that simple.