President Obama: ‘If You’ve Got a Business — You Didn’t Build That. Somebody Else Made That Happen’
The White House has released the transcript of President Obama’s recent speech in Roanoke, Virginia, and it holds a number of noteworthy statements.
The official transcript relates:
There are a lot of wealthy, successful Americans who agree with me — because they want to give something back. They know they didn’t — look, if you’ve been successful, you didn’t get there on your own. You didn’t get there on your own. I’m always struck by people who think, well, it must be because I was just so smart. There are a lot of smart people out there. It must be because I worked harder than everybody else. Let me tell you something — there are a whole bunch of hardworking people out there. [Emphasis added]
He continued:
If you were successful, somebody along the line gave you some help. There was a great teacher somewhere in your life. Somebody helped to create this unbelievable American system that we have that allowed you to thrive. Somebody invested in roads and bridges. If you’ve got a business — you didn’t build that. Somebody else made that happen. The Internet didn’t get invented on its own. Government research created the Internet so that all the companies could make money off the Internet. [Emphasis added]
Now, I understand that what the President is saying is true, but only from a certain point of view. Yes, none of us can do anything without the efforts of other people, but the notion that we are as dependent as the President would like us to believe is simply false – especially when it comes to entrepreneurship.
You could make believe that a business person cannot make it on their own, but then, you can only do that if you ignore the role that the business person plays in their own success. Take the lady who wrote the Harry Potter series as an example. She made it all up as a bedtime story for her kids: in part – to help distract from the fact that she was unemployed at the time. Now, Obama would have you believe that her success then depended on her agent, editor and publisher, then on the book stores and finally, on her customers. But, if this is true, then her agent, editor and publisher depended on her for their success, as did the book stores and, finally, YOU depended on her for your success. But that is an absurdity: you do not need her to be successful any more than those other people/companies do.
The truth is, had she never written Harry Potter, someone else would have written something else. The people and businesses who publish books will ALWAYS succeed because there will ALWAYS be people who want to have their work published. They do not depend on each other, they help each other. This is the essence of the free market. And, given today’s world, had she chose to, our author could have even self-published. Now, who would she have depended on then? NO ONE – because the internet would exist simply because someone wants to put it up and maintain it for fun.
Take another example: my old business. Yes, I had to have companies who produced and shipped raw materials; I needed the products that my products were meant to improve; and I needed advisors and consultants as well as dealers and advertisers. So, according to Obama, I was dependent on ALL of those people: but was I really? I could always find the information I needed in a book, written by someone like our previous author. I could have made my own resins and rubber (yes, I actually know how to do that). I self-distributed, so I didn’t need them: I also did most of my own advertising on discussion boards, so again, I didn’t need help. But then comes the part that no one could have done but me: I found, organized and put all of these things together to form my company, and then I made the masters, produced the instruction sheets, labeling and designed the packaging. When I was first starting out, I also produced and packaged and shipped everything myself. I did my own books and I handled all my own administration work. It was my passion and ability that brought all of this together – no one else. And my company succeeded. Now, had I not done so, I can assure you, there would have been other companies, but there would have NEVER been another Tiger Model Designs. And this is why the President is wrong.
Finally, when it comes right down to it, the President knows he is being disingenuous. You can hear it in his speeches. How many times have you heard him claim credit for being the person who did something? And how many times have you heard him humbly give credit to others – or even say he couldn’t have done something major without the help of others? Just a few weeks ago, he gave a speech in which he used the words “I,” “me” and “mine” some 117 times in approximately 25 minutes and 23 second:
Narcissist-In-Chief Uses First-Person Pronoun “I” And “Me” 117 Times In A Single Speech…
(I apologize for the title, but I wanted to avoid using the Blaze again, and this was among the least offensive of the stories at the top of the search results)
In this one speech, the President referred to himself in the first person once every 13 seconds. That is a tacit admission that – if nothing else – people proudly take credit for the things they have worked to achieve – just like Obama likes to do. However, when it comes to people wanting the rewards for their efforts, Obama and those who think like he does seem to differentiate between the credit they believe they’re entitled to and the rewards they believe you should be allowed to have. I’m sorry, but I see nothing but contradiction and hypocrisy in this line of reasoning, and it sickens me because this is the way people who think they are above you behave toward those they perceive as inferior.
Humbly submitted for your consideration and in sincere hope that you will find something worth considering in my words. I thank you for reading; stay safe and God bless.

“I apologize for the title, but I wanted to avoid using the Blaze again.”
The Weasel Zippers post links to the original story at CNS News. CNS News, of course, was founded by conservative Media Research Center founder Brent Bozell–so in terms of bias, you’ve come up with a source every bit as weak as the Blaze.
Having said that, however, I think they’re probably right in their count. And “narcissist-in-chief” fits Obama, as it has most of our presidents. And as it apparently will Romney, should he somehow be elected–the same article notes that he uses a lot of first-person pronouns, too. Not quite as bad as Obama, but then he hasn’t been elected yet.
I gave you Obama press release on the matter below James. Go read it there.
This reminds me of a post I read on the children’s story, “The Little Red Hen.” The chick used it as an analogy, only she had a big bad wolf come in and eat the bread and the animals. If you do not recall this story, I shall paste it for you (plays muzak….)
http://www.speakaboos.com/story/the-little-red-hen/
Kells,
You must be joking…
No. Let me make it clear for you:
“people proudly take credit for the things they have worked to achieve – just like Obama likes to do. However, when it comes to people wanting the rewards for their efforts, Obama and those who think like he does seem to differentiate between the credit they believe they’re entitled to and the rewards they believe you should be allowed to have. I’m sorry, but I see nothing but contradiction and hypocrisy in this line of reasoning, and it sickens me because this is the way people who think they are above you behave toward those they perceive as inferior.”
In the story of the Little Red Hen, which I take it nobody bothered to read, she works for her labours and is not given any help from the pig, the cat or the duck. In the end of the story, she does not share her reward (bread) as she rightly worked for and earned it. The post that I read added the part of the wolf eating the bread and the animals to represent communism.
I know my mind works a little differently, but sheesh!
Thank you for the explanation. I shouldn’t have commented “off the cuff”.
I apologize.
No need, baby. I’m frequently misunderstood.
I’m laughing now because I screwed up on my explanation…. c’est la vie….
Oh… is that how it works? You just get up one day and find out that somebody else built a business for you, and made it all happen? What would you know about that, Mr President? Have you ever built a business? Actually, scratch that… let’s start small. Ever had an actual bona fide, private-sector job?
This kind of stuff is nauseating… but what’s worse is that people don’t instinctively yell “Bullsh*t!” when he utters inanities like this.
Instead, they sit there and say “yeah! That guy owes me!”
For the sake of crediblity to the sourcing of this story, or if your a bona fide liberal drone sworn against ever visiting the treasonous “The Blaze” we website for fear of stoning/beheading, then go source it for yourself at …. ‘loliminthewhitehousenowb***hes” website:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/07/13/remarks-president-campaign-event-roanoke-virginia
“Ever had an actual bona fide, private-sector job?”
Several, including the one I have now with a private Christian university. Have you? I’ve also worked on farms, in sawmills, in factories, for newspapers, and in corporate public relations (for a little private company called U-Haul; you may have heard of it). Today I still do some freelance work from time to time. My wife also used to own her own company.
I need not go to the White House site, since I agreed with Joe that the account sounded right. I was just questioning his source–you know, as you do on a kneejerk basis every time someone offers something from a site you perceive to be liberal. I am glad that you now consider the White House source to be an authoritative one, though.
Fallacy James …. unless of course your Mr. President now?
I will consider any source as authoritative … especially when they are honest.
btw … does it chappy your hiney when I can corroborate a Glenn Beck story so easily? Free medical advise for you. Get Vagasil. It will help with your chaffed areas.
And in light of all the recent epiphanies handed to us from Obama about what it means to be a C.E.O., I have a question that maybe the followers of liberalism can answer about their leader …
How come Romney’s management of Bain Capital is a potential “felony”, but Obama’s management of Fast and Furious is an Executive Privilege? I mean after all, he is our C.E.O., right?
How about Solyndra? If Obama is the national CEO, and he says the bankers were criminal in their mismanagement of investor money and has even inferred they should do jail time for it, why is he exempt from similar losses?
Because O is the ONE. He can do anything he wishes. Rules do not apply to him.
We could go on, and on, and on, and on ….