The Evidence for a Case of Treason Against Obama IS Coming Out

It seems that many RNL readers think I am over-reacting in my assertion of treason where Obama and Benghazi are concerned. I understand this, we’re all used to everyone crying wolf for attention — and many here no doubt think I am among the most guilty of this. OK, fine, then you tell me what to make of this:

First, we know that the former SEALS who, as we now know, was working for the CIA  in Benghazi trying to track down and destroy weapons that had gotten into the hands of the Libyan rebels (now KNOWN to be Al Qaeda):

American Killed in Libya Was on Intel Mission to Track Weapons

One of the Americans killed alongside Ambassador Christopher Stevens in an attack on a U.S. diplomatic mission in Libya Tuesday told ABC News before his death that he was working with the State Department on an intelligence mission to round up dangerous weapons in the war-torn nation.

In an interview with ABC News last month, Glen Doherty, a 42-year-old former Navy SEAL who worked as a contractor with the State Department, said he personally went into the field to track down so-called MANPADS, shoulder-fired surface-to-air missiles, and destroy them. After the fall of dictator Moammar Gadhafi, the State Department launched a mission to round up thousands of MANPADS that may have been looted from military installations across the country. U.S. officials previously told ABC News they were concerned the MANPADS could fall into the hands of terrorists, creating a threat to commercial airliners.

Now, this should be interesting because these are the same sort of weapons discussed in this story:

Russia: Syria rebels have US-made weapons

Recent footage has emerged of Syrian opposition fighters using old Soviet SA-7 heat-seeking missiles, which can destroy a plane flying at up to 14,000ft.

But the Soviets also claim these weapons include U.S. Stingers.  From the same story:

A senior Russian general has said Syrian rebels now have anti-aircraft weapons, including US-made Stingers.

Which then leads us to this story:

Was Syrian weapons shipment factor in ambassador’s Benghazi visit?

A mysterious Libyan ship — reportedly carrying weapons and bound for Syrian rebels — may have some link to the Sept. 11 terror attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Fox News has learned.

Through shipping records, Fox News has confirmed that the Libyan-flagged vessel Al Entisar, which means “The Victory,” was received in the Turkish port of Iskenderun — 35 miles from the Syrian border — on Sept. 6, just five days before Ambassador Chris Stevens, information management officer Sean Smith and former Navy Seals Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty were killed during an extended assault by more than 100 Islamist militants. 

On the night of Sept. 11, in what would become his last known public meeting, Stevens met with the Turkish Consul General Ali Sait Akin, and escorted him out of the consulate front gate one hour before the assault began at approximately 9:35 p.m. local time. 

Although what was discussed at the meeting is not public, a source told Fox News that Stevens was in Benghazi to negotiate a weapons transfer, an effort to get SA-7 missiles out of the hands of Libya-based extremists.

Now, you are free to believe all of this, all the connections between these stories are just innocent coincidences, but, for me, that strains the bounds of credibility.  This is also why I took the time to write this post:

More on Obama’s Treason: Goes to Bed while Americans are Dying

If you haven’t already, then go to that post and watch the videos in the two links I provided inside it.  Just ignore the source for once and watch the clips.  Then, if you can do that in light of what is in this post and still find excuses for this Administration…  Well, you are more forgiving than I am.  I bet George Bush and Ronald Reagan would have appreciated you giving them a little of that, too.

Oh, and one more thought: this is just the information we have been able to learn with a media that is actively running interference for Obama on this scandal.  What else might we learn if the media (and Congress) were actually doing their jobs and digging into this story so they could tell us what really happened and why?

ADDENDUM:

Throw this into the mix, too:

Muslim Brotherhood Behind Benghazi Attack With Link To Obama

We later learned that the Muslim Brotherhood president of Egypt, Mohammed Morsi, was behind the attack.

We now know it was not initially an attack, but an attempted kidnapping of Ambassador Stevens to use him as a pawn to get their beloved Blind Sheik back.

What is most shocking, however, is that a source within the White House states that it was arranged as an October surprise by Barack Obama. Obama, in order to make the release of the Blind Sheik more palatable to the American people, and to boost his sagging approval ratings, arranged with the Muslim Brotherhood to kidnap Ambassador Stevens. Then, days before the election, acting the part of the hero, planned to release the Blind Sheik in exchange for Ambassador Stevens.

The plan was for security to be minimal at the consulate, protected by only Libyan security guards who would melt away into the night at the appointed time.

The plan fell apart as two former SEALs, Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods, fought the kidnappers, leading to a firefight and subsequent fire, killing Stevens, Woods, Doherty, and also Sean Smith, a communications specialist.

Obama then had to create a cover-up so massive that it will go down in the history books until the end of time.

If this information is true, then this is TREASON!  And if you do not see the strength behind my charge, then…  Well, I honestly do not know what to say to you.  I would have to believe you would defend Obama if he were caught killing puppies and kittens with a club on liveTV (I can’t use babies, he has already done that with his abortion advocacy in Illinois).

ADDENDUM II:

How US Ambassador Chris Stevens May Have Been Linked To Jihadist Rebels In Syria

The official position is that the US has refused to allowheavy weapons into Syria.But there’s growing evidence that U.S. agents—particularly murdered ambassador Chris Stevens—were at least aware of heavy weapons moving from Libya to jihadist Syrian rebels.

In March 2011 Stevens became the official U.S. liaison to the al-Qaeda-linked Libyan opposition, working directly with Abdelhakim Belhadj of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group—a group that has now disbanded, with some fighters reportedly participating in the attack that took Stevens’ life.

In November 2011 The Telegraph reported that Belhadj, acting as head of the Tripoli Military Council, “met with Free Syrian Army [FSA] leaders in Istanbul and on the border with Turkey” in an effort by the new Libyan government to provide money and weapons to the growing insurgency in Syria.

Last month The Times of London reported that a Libyan ship “carrying the largest consignment of weapons for Syria … has docked in Turkey.” The shipment reportedly weighed 400 tons and included SA-7 surface-to-air anti-craft missiles and rocket-propelled grenades. 

Do you remember this scene?  Do you think it fits this story?  I sure do:

About these ads

44 thoughts on “The Evidence for a Case of Treason Against Obama IS Coming Out

  1. What is most shocking, however, is that a source within the White House states that it was arranged as an October surprise by Barack Obama. Obama, in order to make the release of the Blind Sheik more palatable to the American people, and to boost his sagging approval ratings, arranged with the Muslim Brotherhood to kidnap Ambassador Stevens. Then, days before the election, acting the part of the hero, planned to release the Blind Sheik in exchange for Ambassador Stevens.

    What is most shocking is that you actually believe this scenario makes sense!

    • Let me see if I have this correct:

      We now KNOW that Obama created a lie about this video being to blame, then said they would jail an innocent man (AND THEY HAVE) to “get him.” Then he ran $70k in advertisements in a foreign country when he KNEW it was a lie. Then he goes tot he UN and defends the U.S. govt but tosses AMERICA under the bus, then attacks the 1st Amendment (THAT’S THE CONSTITUTION – the very thing he is sworn to protect) AND he says he supports a global ban on slander against Islam. He does ALL of this KNOWING he is lying through his teeth and I am the one who has lost it for believing he wants to give back the blink sheik???

      See, Greg just caught Obama standing over the dead puppies and kittens with the bloody club in his hands and the blood on his clothes and what does he do? He attacks me for pointing out that Obama is killing puppies and kittens with a club. Told you there would be people who would do this, I just didn’t think we had anyone that far gone on the RNL. :-(

  2. You see, B came across some cookie crumbs and an empty glass with milk stains on the rim, and he assumed that Obama just killed a family for their cookies. That sort of thinking does not surprise me at all, coming from a self-proclaimed prophet.

    You are the far gone one, B. There are questions about Benghazi, and Obama’s statements about it are worth an investigation.. But your conclusion, that Obama would seriously consider freeing Rahman, shows much your hatred of our president has warped your thinking.. In another post you defend Qaddaffi against the ‘bad guys’. Pathetic.
    A free blind Sheik is the last thing anybody wants, the radicals want to use him as an excuse for bombings and rallying cries.

    The only valid reason for moving ol’ no-eyes is to have him tried for terrorism in Egypt, something mentioned in your article. To that, I say no, not until a stable, pro-western government has been established in Egypt..

    • Qadaffi, bad guy? Maybe so, but he was also a secret American ally and stabilizing force in the region:

      Qaddafi: From Private Ally to Public Enemy

      Obama is NOT thinking of giving up the blind sheik? Interesting:

      Will Obama Free the Blind Sheik?

      Are senior Obama administration officials considering transferring to Egypt a poisonously influential Islamist cleric serving a life term in federal prison for trying to unleash a war of urban terrorism in the United States? That’s the impression several officials have given over the past three months, apparently out of fear that if the cleric dies in U.S. custody, American outposts in the Middle East could be overrun by vengeful mobs.

      In fact, their is a connection between BOTH of these stories and Benghazi, but you won’t see it because you are blind to anything that would suggest you have been wrong. I think you once told me it is the mark of a strong man to admit when he is wrong. I truly wish you were a stronger man than you apparently are. :-(

      • “The first hint of something fishy came in June, when Hani Nour Eldin, a member of the terrorist group that carried out the Luxor slaughter (60 tourists murdered with notes inserted into their dead body cavities demanding the release of the blind sheik) and who had himself spent 11 years in Egyptian jail on terrorism charges, was granted a visa to come to the United States, where he visited the White House and urged that Abdel Rahman be transferred to Egypt.”

        from the Wall Street Journal article you linked to above …..

      • Public enemy #1, Convicted Murderer and Islamic Terrorist, is granted a VISA to travel to America and attends a meeting at the WHITEHOUSE JUNE 2012.

  3. And how you can push for Obama’s impeachment, and yet give dubya every single benefit of the doubt as to his lying us into a war that did not need fighting? This is why our presidents think that they can get away with the things that they do, B, BECAUSE THEY CAN!!! Because of short-memoried, partisan junkies such as yourself, who forget the the trangressions of old and chase the new ones, ad infinitum, leaving the older transgressor ‘vindicated’.

    • G., I cannot believe that the president would be in the dark if an attack were happening at a U.S. Embassy. As far as Iraq, Bush took the correct channels by going through Congress first. Considering that this was the year after 9/11, I can easily understand why they were all ready to jump the gun. From what I recall, they questioned the UN about being turned down by inspections, and so thought the worse.

      As much as I did not like the war in Iraq, I will tell you that every Iraqi person I have met tells me they were happy we were there. From what I gather, they were losing their freedoms, and had been for some time. I know it is not our place to be the world’s policeman, but I’m happy for the Iraqi’s because I feel an oppressive ideology has grasped the Middle East. Perhaps I think that because I just spoke to Iraqi women.

    • Please tell me how “W” convinced the intelligence agencies of nearly every other nation on the planet to believe Hussein had WMD’s. Also, explain why so many DEMOCRATS agreed with him and voted with him. Do that, and I listen to this rant of yours. Until then, it is just what it is: the rantings of a man in denial who STILL can’t stop the voices in his head from telling him “The Conservatives were right!”

      • Please tell me how “W” convinced the intelligence agencies of nearly every other nation on the planet to believe Hussein had WMD’s.- he didn’t, B, here is the list of countries willing to be seen as supporting the invasion.

        .Afghanistan, Albania, Australia, Azerbaijan, Bulgaria, Colombia, the Czech Republic, Denmark, El Salvador, Eritrea, Estonia, Ethiopia, Georgia, Hungary, Italy, Japan, South Korea, Latvia, Lithuania, Macedonia, the Netherlands, Nicaragua, the Philippines, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Spain, Turkey, United Kingdom and Uzbekistan

        no Germany, no Brazil, no Chile, no China ,no Russia, no Mexico, no Spain, no Islamic countries except Turkey, which only allowed fly-overs as its contribution, Poland donated 200 soldiers. Afghanistan, well, we did have some influence in their government. At the time, we even provided Kharzei with his personal bodyguards.

        Pretty much all a country had to do to get on this list was say it wanted on the list. Many just offered fly-over rights, some did not even do that. Makes you wonder why 140 nations REFUSED to join the coalition?

        As far as intelligence, Germany warned us about Curveball’s unreliability –Mr. Havel discreetly called Washington to tell senior Bush administration officials that an initial report from the Czech domestic intelligence agency that Mr. Atta had met with an Iraqi intelligence officer, Ahmad Khalil Ibrahim Samir al-Ani, in Prague in April 2001 could not be substantiated.–James Risen, NYT 10-21-02

        ‘Also, explain why so many DEMOCRATS agreed with him and voted with him. Do that, and I listen to this rant of yours’. They were spoon-fed the information by the Bush Administration, and the mood of the country was such that many dems ran from their principles, and voted for the invasion out of fear for their jobs. I have no sympathy for those who lost their respective elections anyway.

        Until then, it is just what it is: the rantings of a man in denial who STILL can’t stop the voices in his head from telling him “The Conservatives were right!”-So where are the WMD’s?

        good article on the coalition…http://www.david-morrison.org.uk/iraq/coalition-of-willing.htm

          • Your “you proved my point without realizing it’ shtick is growing old

            Actually, you have presented no proof for your contention, and yet you insist that I must have the GD’ed top secret papers from every intelligence agency in the world. There were no Atomic weapons, the Sarin we sold Saddam had decayed by the war’s start. Oopsies! just doesn’t count as a response to what we did to the people of Iraq.
            Qaddafi, a secret friend of the US? You are one in possession of one diseased mind, B.

            • You seem to have forgotten that YOUR peeps are among the many who claimed Hussein had yellow cake. But then, Hussein didn’t have any nuclear material — you said so:

              Secret U.S. mission hauls uranium from Iraq

              The last major remnant of Saddam Hussein’s nuclear program — a huge stockpile of concentrated natural uranium — reached a Canadian port Saturday to complete a secret U.S. operation that included a two-week airlift from Baghdad and a ship voyage crossing two oceans.

              The removal of 550 metric tons of “yellowcake”the seed material for higher-grade nuclear enrichment — was a significant step toward closing the books on Saddam’s nuclear legacy. It also brought relief to U.S. and Iraqi authorities who had worried the cache would reach insurgents or smugglers crossing to Iran to aid its nuclear ambitions.

              I also find it interesting that you ignore all the reports that a good many of these WMD’s were moved to Syria. Now, I wonder, could those stories be connected to this one:

              Obama Warns Syria on Control of WMD

              I think you suffer from a one-way visor: you see ONLY what you want to and make no attempt at all to deal with the evidence that contradicts or poses problems for that assumed world view.

              Greg, how many times do I have to knock you down before you accept the offered hand up?

              • You are clutching Syrian straws, B, You fail to make a logical argument for Saddam to send his weapons, his most powerful weapons, to another country, in the hopes that what? Assad will use the nukes to bring us down? Or that Assad will just quietly give back all the firepower entrusted to him. You just ignore contradictions, or embrace them like a lover.
                As for the BS about yellowcake, it was your hero, Cheney, who outed a CIA agent in order to discredit the reports that Iraq was amassing large quantities of the stuff. And YES, B she was a covert agent, with a cover story and a phony job with a phony corporation.

                But go on hiding your head in your own posterior, B, while we realists deal with the world’s real problems.

                • More lies? Cheney didn’t “out” anyone. She was already known months before that due to the work of a reporter. That you cling to lies and deny the truth is not helping you.

              • B, are you the new Sawdust?

                That yellowcake was not a secret, B. It was left over from the stockpile that Saddam had built up for the reactor that Israel bombed in 1981, and for another reactor destroyed in the first desert war.
                Unless Beck says different, of course.

                • Now you need to cling to Beck??? Sad, G. Beck isn’t even talking about any of this. He’s off on some political kick right now.

                  But you are correct about one thing: he has been dead-on-target concerning Obama’s political alliances with the Islamic forces in the Middle East.

                    • OK, so I am wrong: Hussein didn’t have any yellow cake. Now, please inform those media companies so they can change their stories to fit your narrative.

                    • B, the yellowcake that Saddam had was sealed and secured by the UN, Saddam was not using it, nor could he without it becoming known. The mission to remove the yellowcake was not a secret, either.. It was reported on ABC News and on the BBC<NPR, the WaPo, and the NYT back in 2008, Some secret.

                    • And there you have it: Greg says you can trust everything the main stream media reports and nothing that anyone else reports — unless they agree with his narrative.

                      See how easy it is to make your case? All you have to do is shoot the opposition.

                      As for the rest of us? Well, silly us, we actually think we’re supposed to try to convince people using reasoned arguments supported by facts, examples, analogies and illustrations.

                    • All you have to do is claim the media lies, and I have no case all of a sudden. They really gave you a diploma at whatever jerkwater college you claim to have attended? Hans Blix had this to say in 2009, about the war and its run-up….
                      Devastating critique: Former UN weapons expert Hans Blix says Bush and Blair showed ‘very bad judgement’

                      Tony Blair and George Bush were orchestrating a witch-hunt against Saddam Hussein that ended with the Iraq War, according to a former UN weapons inspector.

                      Hans Blix said the two leaders behaved like 17th century witchfinders in their willingness to oust the dictator.

                      In an interview with the Mail, he revealed that Mr Blair tried to force him to change his mind about the absence of WMDs in Iraq to placate the Americans.

                      The former Swedish diplomat, who headed the UN weapons inspection team in the run-up to war, concluded that Mr Blair and Mr Bush ‘misled themselves and then they misled the public’.

                      He said: ‘They were convinced they had their witch in front of them, and they searched for the evidence and believed it without critical examination.

                      ‘I’m not saying they acted in bad faith [but] they exercised very bad judgment. A modicum of critical thinking would have made them sceptical. When you start a war which cost thousands of lives you should be more certain than they were.’

                      Mr Blix dismissed the ‘dodgy’ Downing Street dossier on Saddam’s weapons which made the case for war as ‘a politician’s twist’.

                      The claim that Iraq could fire chemical weapons in 45 minutes was ‘hyperbole’. Mr Blix’s inspectors viewed 700 supposed WMD sites in the months before the war but found nothing more than a handful of empty chemical munitions.

                      Five weeks before the invasion he revealed these findings to the UN and six days later Mr Blair told him his report had undermined American support for the UN process.

                      But Mr Blix stuck to his guns and warned the former prime minister not to invade, telling him: ‘It would prove paradoxical and absurd if 250,000 troops were to invade Iraq and find very little.’

  4. “G., I cannot believe that the president would be in the dark if an attack were happening at a U.S. Embassy.”

    Exactly Kells, and no matter what G tries to sell you, Obama wasn’t. Good for you for no being gullible.

    “As far as Iraq, Bush took the correct channels by going through Congress first.”

    Right again Kells, and it’s just another small, but very important point that G would intentionally leave out. Well done.

    “Considering that this was the year after 9/11, I can easily understand why they were all ready to jump the gun. From what I recall, they questioned the UN about being turned down by inspections, and so thought the worse.”

    And like the statement above, opportunist G would never remind you of the fact that even the Democrats in Congress were fearing the worst … just like the Republicans … and the Independents … and did what they felt was best for this nation.

    No further terrorist attacks happened on their watch — something else G would not care to remind you about.

    • Never mind, the UN has openly stated they are worried about Syria’s WMD’s that they came from IRAQ.

      Yes, yes, “Bush Lied”….

  5. No further terrorist attacks happened on their watch — something else G would not care to remind you about.– You are not choking on the kool-aid, AUgger?
    But the big one did occur ON THEIR WATCH, you sycophantic oaf! Because Bush and Cheney did not listen to the outgoing Clinton Administration, ignored the growing threat of al qaeda, then sent bad intel to Congress, who don’t get a pass from me. And children, that is why the nation that attacked us is still a nation, still selling us oil, Because your hero, George dubya, was more interested in going after Saddam instead of the King of Saudi Arabia.

    • But the big one did occur ON THEIR WATCH, you sycophantic oaf!

      Because CLINTON ORDERED THE INTEL COMMUNITY NOT TO TALK TO EACH OTHER — thereby allowing reports of suspicious activities by these very terrorists to go unconnected.

      Yep, just as you say, Augger: Greg tells half the story — the half that makes him look good and the people he hates look bad. ;-)

      • And you make up half the story, B. Let’s see what BS ‘proof’ you have for this latest attempt to ‘Blame Bill’.
        1st of all, it wasn’t on Bill’s watch, second, although maybe not in importance, is the conclusion of the 9/11 commission on this same subject…

        “The information sharing failures in the summer of 2001 were not the result of legal barriers but of the failure of individuals to understand that the barriers did not apply to the facts at hand,”…. “Simply put, there was no legal reason why the information could not have been shared.”

        See, B? Other people misinterpret things, not just you.

      • “Yep, just as you say, Augger: Greg tells half the story — the half that makes him look good and the people he hates look bad.”

        Of course he does. And even when he isn’t … ::: yawn :::

        Mr. Hand was more intellectually stimulating. Just saying.

  6. Since we seem to be caught in another “My guy can’t be guilty because YOUR guy was guilty of the same thing” rabbit chase, allow me to show you how they get away with it in their mind:

    They ignore and reject evidence — or redefine words when they can’t do that

    So, apparently, U.S. Congressmen and Senators are not legitimate sources of information, and chemical and biological weapons are not WMDs. See, case closed: no evidence of WMDs in Iraq (at least, not in the liberal/progressive world of never-never land, anyway).

    OH, AND THEN THERE’S THIS:

    1 — WMDs are NOT why we went into Iraq. You would never know it now that the leftist media has re-written history, just like you’d never know McCarthy was cporrect about nearly everyone he accused of being a communist. But then, the truth does not matter to the children of Alinksy.

    2 — NONE of this has ANYTHING to do with OBAMA COMMITTING TREASON! It’s just meant to take your eyes off the fact that OBAMA COMMITTED TREASON!

    • I love that song. I can’t remember the name of the group. I wanna say everclear or effervescence?? Now that’s going to drive me crazy. Naturally, your stupid links never include the piece of music being performed!

      Your link did get me thinking on Desert Storm. Weren’t they using chemical weapons?

      • Now I can answer this one definitely: YES!

        I know this one beyond any shadow of a doubt because I was there, I have a tape of the alert on my Company and Battalion push warning of nerve and mustard in the breach. I have the audio tape to this day (I was taping our company and battalion push as we breached the mine fields)

          • “But were the gases ever actually used on our invading forces?”

            You seem to know the answer. You tell us … since you were obviously in each and every engagement.

            • @Augger,

              The answer here is YES! We were gassed in the breach by the chemical mines they had buried. Greg will deny it because he ONLY accepts reports from the main stream media. I, on the other hand, was actually there (Greg wasn’t), and I was on the company and battalion push when the FOX vehicle (not the news channel, Greg) put out the warning that there was nerve and mustard agent in the breach. I have that audio warning on a mini cassette my comms tech had spliced into the CVC helmet I wore. What’s more, I still suffer to this day from another incident that affected nearly 1/3 of our unit approximately 30 days after the invasion. Apparently, we drove through an area that had been contaminated by nerve agent. Today, I have pronounced breathing problems from this exposure.

              but then, Greg will ignore my reality because it is easier for him to believe I lie…

Talk Amongst Yourselves:

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s