Who Are We?

As the Republican establishment thrashes and flails around in an effort to give away their positions on key issues in a vain attempt to appeal to “independents” and “moderates” – people who are basically just liberals who are too stupid to know what they are, I thought it appropriate to remind them who conservatives really are.

If we bend on key agenda items like immigration, abortion and taxes, we are no better than Democrats – actually, that would be what we are. The free counsel the left is giving in the afterglow of their win is: “to get more votes, you have to be like us”.

That advice is worth exactly what we are paying for it – nothing.

So time for yet another re-post – this one from June 18 of 2011:

So many of our liberal, leftist, communist, socialist, Marxist and/or “progressive” friends try to cast conservatives as Nazi’s, racists, bigots or use slurs like the term “teabaggers” to define us while obfuscating and blurring the definition of who they are. Obama isn’t a socialist, OMG – he’s not a Marxist or statist – how dare we insinuate that he is anything other than a patriot! Call him a “progressive” and get the same reaction (I refuse to use this term without quotation marks because these folks are 180 degrees opposed to progression, they are regressive), he’s not a “progressive” we are told – some on the left have even called him mainstream or even stretched the level of credulity to call him “conservative” (no less a liberal luminary than Paul Krugman has done this).

Conservatives are actually pretty easy to define.

The Sharon Statement

The following is the first statement of principles of the modern conservative movement, written by former ACU Chairman M. Stanton Evans and adopted in conference at Sharon, Connecticut (at the home of early ACU supporter William F. Buckley Jr.), on September 11, 1960.

In this time of moral and political crises, it is the responsibility of the youth of America to affirm certain eternal truths.

We, as young conservatives, believe:

That foremost among the transcendent values is the individual’s use of his God-given free will, whence derives his right to be free from the restrictions of arbitrary force;

That liberty is indivisible, and that political freedom cannot long exist without economic freedom;

That the purpose of government is to protect those freedoms through the preservation of internal order, the provision of national defense, and the administration of justice;

That when government ventures beyond these rightful functions, it accumulates power, which tends to diminish order and liberty;

That the Constitution of the United States is the best arrangement yet devised for empowering government to fulfill its proper role, while restraining it from the concentration and abuse of power;

That the genius of the Constitution—the division of powers—is summed up in the clause that reserves primacy to the several states, or to the people, in those spheres not specifically delegated to the Federal government;

That the market economy, allocating resources by the free play of supply and demand, is the single economic system compatible with the requirements of personal freedom and constitutional government, and that it is at the same time the most productive supplier of human needs;

That when government interferes with the work of the market economy, it tends to reduce the moral and physical strength of the nation; that when it takes from one man to bestow on another, it diminishes the incentive of the first, the integrity of the second, and the moral autonomy of both;

That we will be free only so long as the national sovereignty of the United States is secure; that history shows periods of freedom are rare, and can exist only when free citizens concertedly defend their rights against all enemies;

That the forces of international Communism are, at present, the greatest single threat to these liberties;

That the United States should stress victory over, rather than coexistence with, this menace; and

That American foreign policy must be judged by this criterion: does it serve the just interests of the United States?

Pretty clear, isn’t it? If not, the American Conservative Union has more.

About these ads

10 thoughts on “Who Are We?

  1. Who are we Utah? It’s easy to define….We are the ones who will tow the wagon for the left … until our money runs out.

    To those riding in the back:

    Look… it’s basic economics, and the math doesn’t care how you FEEL about it. “Punish” companies, Increase business costs, and companies will cut back… or move jobs offshore.

    Its nothing personal, but economics is “the dismal science” for a reason. You can rail against it all you like; it won’t change the reality…. and you can’t say you weren’t told.

  2. You could have answered the “Who are we?” question much more succinctly with: “the people who keep losing elections.”

    • Succinctly? Likely. As accurately? No.

      I make not apologies for telling it like it is. I’m not here to placate your sensitivities. We clear?

      • My comment (as was probably obvious to every thinking person here) was aimed at the person who asked the original question. I care not about your sensitivities or your idiotic knee-jerk responses to comments that aren’t directed at you in the first place. We clear? ;-)

        • You pen it under my reply …it’s directed at me. Or are you just too stupid to use the forum correctly? Take your pick.

          We clear about that?

          • If I’m responding to you, I’ll hit reply next to your comment and then write it, as I did here. Or perhaps you’re too stupid to know how to do that?

            But I’ll no longer make the mistake of assuming anything is clear to you.

            • And that is exactly what you did … and precisely why I got the new post flag on the top of my WordPress, McPherson. Or perhaps you are just too much of a self professed liar to actually cede the point that was otherwise so clear?

              But I’ll no longer make the mistake of assuming you are anything resembling honest.

              • “And that is exactly what you did … ”

                If so, Augger, it should show up as indented from your comment like my next one does. In fact, I hadn’t even seen your comment before posting my own. I’d started mine, been interrupted by a student with who needed help, and then finished and hit the “post comment” button.

                “”and precisely why I got the new post flag on the top of my WordPress”

                I assume you’d get a “new post” flag if anyone commented on the thread, as I do. If I’d responded to you, the flag should say that. Still, I see why you’d make such an assumption, and if I’m not using a clear direct quote I should do a better job of including the name of the person to whom I’m responding. I apologize for failing to do so.

                “I’ll no longer make the mistake of assuming you are anything resembling honest.”

                Since you’ve been accusing me of being dishonest since I got here (while sometimes misrepresenting my views), I can live with that. :-)

  3. Democrats – “to get more votes, you have to be like us”.

    Well, to win elections, we’d have to lose our conscience and begin lieng, cheating, changing, creating, and stealing votes.

    Fortunately republicans arent going to do that, sooooo, they will never win another election that democrats control and want.

    You republicans who keep wringing your hands over “how did we lose” & ” how could our data be sooooo wrong?”. Well folks, it wasn’t. Time to accept reality & trust yourself, your government has just been stolen from you.

Talk Amongst Yourselves:

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s