And the blogger is, for his piece on “to cut or not to cut,” (drum roll, please)……………..AUGGER!
The winner walking away with his post:
Male Versus Female Circumcision – (warning: medical images of graphic nature)
Well done, doc, well done. Now, pick a 2013 subject and get it posted. The clock is already ticking on you.
Oh my. Can we just ramp up our Rule 5 posts?
Congratulations Augger! I remember that post. I think I’ll go revisit it since I don’t have to scroll….
I’m calling a foul on this one. Even though it was medical in nature, it did have a picture of a vagina. That has to be at least worth 4.5 of a Rule 5.
Sorry, boss, the ruling on the field stands. Augger’s picture was not meant to illicit the same response as a Rule 5 post, hence it is a non-rule 5 post.
I don’t makes da rules: I just enforce dem.
Augger,
May I re-suggest an article on sexually transmitted diseases?
I did a little research and have had discussions with friends of mine that are MDs,
What the Doctors know, is REALLY frightening, and everyone else should know the hazards too. Additionally, a close friend of mine that practices family law was explaining to me the number of marriages that are ruined due to std’s…..
I attempted to inform my children in hopes they will be careful in the future …
Utah,
Is the original “Male versus female circumcision” post “gone”?
Not unless augger took it down…