HIGH NOON: SHERIFF BIDEN, NRA SHOWDOWN...
'The president is going to act'...
BANG BANG: CUOMO TO ANNOUNCE SWEEPING GUN LAWS...
Iowa lawmaker calls for confiscation...
CT lawmaker calls for background checks to buy ammo...
Gun sales soar in Atlanta...
'Folks are grabbing just about any gun they can get their hands on'...
WHITE HOUSE THREATENS 'EXECUTIVE ORDERS' ON GUNS
This is what the front page of The Drudge Report looks like right now, and IT IS DEAD ON ACCURATE!
If you are one of those who thinks people like myself are making much to do about nothing, you couldn’t be more wrong — nor could you possibly be more of an enemy to your country. yes, if you are not alarmed by this story, I am accusing you of subversion/treason.
If Obama tries to remove a constitutionally protected INDIVIDUAL RIGHT by decree, this would be an act of tyranny. This is not “my opinion,” it is a cold, hard fact! Here, read the definition of tyranny:
Definition of TYRANNY
1: oppressive power <every form of tyranny over the mind of man — Thomas Jefferson>; especially : oppressive power exerted by government <the tyranny of a police state>2a : a government in which absolute power is vested in a single ruler; especially : one characteristic of an ancient Greek city-state b : the office, authority, and administration of a tyrant3: a rigorous condition imposed by some outside agency or force <living under the tyranny of the clock — Dixon Wecter>
4: an oppressive, harsh, or unjust act : a tyrannical act <workers who had suffered tyrannies>
THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES DOES NOT HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO AMEND THE U.S. CONSTITUTION BY DECREE! On the contrary: he swore an oath to prevent people from doing exactly what he is now threatening to do. But then, I have warned you that tyrants will always tell you what they intend to do, you just have to have the courage to believe them, and then act appropriately.
The Left will ALWAYS tell You what it Plans to Do
Now, if Obama bans the very types of weapons we would need to resist open oppression, what is to stop him from carrying out on his threat to restrict our free speech? Folks, these are the last two constitutional protections left: the right to speak our minds and the right to defend ourselves from tyranny. Everything else has been trampled. These last two are all that remains of our liberty.
So, if Obama does what he threatens to do, the time will finally be at hand to decide whether or not you will be this man:
Or this man?



Vermont State Rep. Fred Maslack has read the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution,
as well as Vermont ‘s own Constitution very carefully, and his strict interpretation of
these documents is popping some eyeballs in New England and elsewhere.
Maslack recently proposed a bill to register “non-gun-owners” and require them to pay
a $500 fee to the state. Thus Vermont would become the first state to require a permit for
the luxury of going about unarmed and assess a fee of $500 for the privilege of
not owning a gun. Maslack read the “militia” phrase of the Second Amendment as
not only the right of the individual citizen to bear arms, but as’a clear
mandate to do so’. He believes that universal gun ownership was advocated by the
Framers of the Constitution as an antidote to a “monopoly of force” by the
government as well as criminals.
Vermont ’s constitution states explicitly that “the people have a right to bear arms
for the defense of themselves and the State” and those persons who are “conscientiously
scrupulous of bearing arms” shall be required to “pay such equivalent.” Clearly, says Maslack, Vermonters
have a constitutional obligation to arm themselves, so that they are capable of
responding to “any situation that may arise.”
Under the bill, adults who choose not to own a firearm would be required to register their name,
address, Social Security Number, and driver’s license number with the state.
“There is a legitimate government interest in knowing who is not prepared to
defend the state should they be asked to do so,” Maslack says.
Vermont already boasts a high rate of gun ownership along with the least restrictive
laws of any state …. it’s currently the only state that allows a citizen to
carry a concealed firearm without a permit. This combination of plenty of guns
and few laws regulating them has resulted in a crime rate that is the third
lowest in the nation.
” America is at that awkward stage. It’s too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot
the bastards.” This makes sense! There is no reason why gun owners should have
to pay taxes to support police protection for people not wanting to own guns.
Let them contribute their fair share and pay their own way. Sounds reasonable to me!
Non-gun owners require more police to protect them and this fee should go to paying for their
defense!
Dusty,
That comment needs to be a full post!
I agree but I can’t post……………….
I’ll work on that. Hang tight for a day or two.
Is the 18th Century Dude….San Adams ??
Don,
That would be my spiritual favorite of our founders: Patrick Henry
Black, White, Green, Yellow, Plaid, or whatever color you, or Obama wishes to assign to him/himself on any given day … despite your liberal hyperventilation(s), we did not vote for a totalitarian dictator. You did.
Augger,
Who was that dart aimed at? Or was that an artillery round: addressed to “whom it may concern?”
LOL
I imagine he was tossing it at the 59,903,905 idiots that don’t seem to have any working brain cells.
Then I was right: it was artillery — and a tac nuke at that