The Road to Serfdom: “Single Payer”

Say hello to government run healthcare:

WASHINGTON –  Dozens of lawmakers are taking another crack at enacting a so-called “public option” health insurance plan — this time, pitching it as a way to reduce the deficit.

On Tuesday, more than 40 House Democrats led by Rep. Jan Schakowsky, D-Ill., and Rep. Harry Waxman, D-Calif., revisited the idea floated — and eventually scrapped — during the battle over the federal health care overhaul. They introduced the Public Option Deficit Act which they say will give health care consumers “more choice and lower their premiums.”

“ObamaCare is already helping millions of Americans get the health care they need, but it can be made even better,” Schakowsky said in a statement.

“It would provide premiums that are 5 percent to 7 percent lower than private insurance plans,” she added.

Schakowsky argued that the plan would lower insurance costs and address deficit concerns — claiming it could save $104 billion over 10 years. A statement from her office did not specify how, though prior Congressional Budget Office reports have claimed a public option could trim the deficit.

The commies at the AFL-CIO are on board, of course:

Health care experts have long said that a public health insurance option not only would provide lower-cost health insurance for those who choose it but would also force private insurers to lower their premiums. A public option was a key element of the 2009 House-passed version of health care reform, but it did not make it to the final bill.

Now, as lawmakers focus on deficit reduction, with many Republicans calling for cuts in health care benefits and shifting even more costs to working families, the creation of a public option as a deficit-reducing tool—along with its other benefits—is back on the table.

There is nothing that a “single payer” or “public option” has in common with the actual risk mitigation of an insurance pool. When a government takes over, the only risk mitigation strategy that is available is rationing, total exclusion or euthanasia. Single payer is nothing but wealth transfer.

Obamacare was nothing but a precursor – all conservatives knew that…so did the “progs” – only the gullible “middle” thought it was something else.

About these ads

4 thoughts on “The Road to Serfdom: “Single Payer”

  1. Road to serfdom, indeed. All of our insurances rose, not just health. Adding insult to injury, the take-home pay is lowered due to SS tax. These Democratic lawmakers are playing a game of musical chairs. Do you recall what happens when you don’t find a chair?

  2. Worth re-stating:

    “There is nothing that a “single payer” or “public option” has in common with the actual risk mitigation of an insurance pool. When a government takes over, the only risk mitigation strategy that is available is rationing, total exclusion or euthanasia. Single payer is nothing but wealth transfer.”

  3. The overwhelming majority of Americans HATE this legislation even two years after it was signed. Most of American understands that this is a BAD idea. When even MSM polls that we HATE it worst than cabbage boiled for a hour, you’d think Congress would get the message. There is something else going on here. What?

Talk Amongst Yourselves:

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s