Please note these stories:
These two stories are directly connected. Do you see the relation? The second story is an indirect but openly stated admission that Obama intends to go after anyone who opposes his agenda on the basis that they are behaving “irresponsibly.” But here’s the most important point: not only does he not define “irresponsible,” all of the things he lists as “irresponsible” are actually legal (or were at the time people were doing them). Now I ask you, how is it “the rule of law” when you can be declared “irresponsible” and face the full wrath of the federal government for following the law?
There’s one more thing I’d like you to consider: we’ve traveled down this road at least twice before in this nation. Once under Wilson and again under FDR, and both times the American people determined it was a mistake to travel it. But there is a difference between then and now. Back then, the majority of us still understood and embraced the principles of individual rights, liberty and the rule of law. Today — not so much. So, how do you think things are going to turn out this time?