Yes, the title of this post is intended to remind you of a well-known series of educational/instructional books.
First, watch this:
Now, read this:
Definition of FUNDAMENTAL
1a : serving as an original or generating source : primary <a discovery fundamental to modern computers>
b : serving as a basis supporting existence or determining essential structure or function : basic
2a : of or relating to essential structure, function, or facts : radical <fundamental change>; also : of or dealing with general principles rather than practical application <fundamental science>
b : adhering to fundamentalism
3: of, relating to, or produced by the lowest component of a complex vibration
4: of central importance : principal <fundamental purpose>
5: belonging to one’s innate or ingrained characteristics : deep-rooted <her fundamental good humor>
Definition of TRANSFORM
1a : to change in composition or structure
b : to change the outward form or appearance of
c : to change in character or condition : convert
2: to subject to mathematical transformation
3: to cause (a cell) to undergo genetic transformation
Now, taking into account the context of Obama’s assertion, he is saying that he intends to fundamentally transform this nation. That means he intends to change the principles and ideals upon which it is founded: the “fundamentals” of our nation. Now, if he attempts to do this in any way other than going through the established process (i.e. amendments or a constitutional convention), that, folks, is subversion and subversion is a prosecutable offense.
So, has Obama done anything to change our system of government without going through the proper process? Well, yes!
Add unconstitutional drone strikes to assassinate U.S. citizens without due process; bypassing Congress to make law through the Federal agencies (i.e. cap and trade, the EPA, etc); the auto bailouts (a clear violation of U.S. bankruptcy law and Obama’s oath of office to enforce said laws); his refusal to enforce the immigration laws; gun running to drug cartels; gun running to America’s active military enemies (i.e. open treason); and any number of other executive orders he has passed granting himself powers that the constitution does not authorize:
Now, here is where I have to make a confession: none of this makes Obama into an emperor or dictator. I will confess that he does not meet the definition of either of these two things. However, his words, deeds and actions do dictate that we understand another definition that does apply to him:
Definition of TYRANT
1a : an absolute ruler unrestrained by law or constitution
b : a usurper of sovereignty
2a : a ruler who exercises absolute power oppressively or brutally
b : one resembling an oppressive ruler in the harsh use of authority or power
And there you have it: proof — using his own words and actions — that Obama is a tyrant. Learn it, live it, love it!