Tyranny: Logic for Liberals

Yes, the title of this post is intended to remind you of a well-known series of educational/instructional books.

First, watch this:

Now, read this:

Definition of FUNDAMENTAL

1a : serving as an original or generating source : primary <a discovery fundamental to modern computers>

b : serving as a basis supporting existence or determining essential structure or function : basic

2a : of or relating to essential structure, function, or facts : radical <fundamental change>; also : of or dealing with general principles rather than practical application <fundamental science>

b : adhering to fundamentalism

3: of, relating to, or produced by the lowest component of a complex vibration

4: of central importance : principal <fundamental purpose>

5: belonging to one’s innate or ingrained characteristics : deep-rooted <her fundamental good humor>

Definition of TRANSFORM

1a : to change in composition or structure

b : to change the outward form or appearance of

c : to change in character or condition : convert

2: to subject to mathematical transformation

3: to cause (a cell) to undergo genetic transformation

Now, taking into account the context of Obama’s assertion, he is saying that he intends to fundamentally transform this nation.  That means he intends to change the principles and ideals upon which it is founded: the “fundamentals” of our nation.  Now, if he attempts to do this in any way other than going through the established process (i.e. amendments or a constitutional convention), that, folks, is subversion and subversion is a prosecutable offense.

So, has Obama done anything to change our system of government without going through the proper process?  Well, yes!

This is How Liberty Dies

Add unconstitutional drone strikes to assassinate U.S. citizens without due process; bypassing Congress to make law through the Federal agencies (i.e. cap and trade, the EPA, etc); the auto bailouts (a clear violation of U.S. bankruptcy law and Obama’s oath of office to enforce said laws); his refusal to enforce the immigration laws; gun running to drug cartels; gun running to America’s active military enemies (i.e. open treason); and any number of other executive orders he has passed granting himself powers that the constitution does not authorize:

Now, here is where I have to make a confession: none of this makes Obama into an emperor or dictator.  I will confess that he does not meet the definition of either of these two things.  However, his words, deeds and actions do dictate that we understand another definition that does apply to him:

Definition of TYRANT

1a : an absolute ruler unrestrained by law or constitution

b : a usurper of sovereignty

2a : a ruler who exercises absolute power oppressively or brutally

b : one resembling an oppressive ruler in the harsh use of authority or power

And there you have it: proof — using his own words and actions — that Obama is a tyrant.  Learn it, live it, love it!

3 thoughts on “Tyranny: Logic for Liberals

  1. Isn’t it odd that so many see it and hear it. But the people that could take him down or impeach see nothing and know nothing. Makes one beleive this entire congress and senate are with Obama and against We the People. What is wrong with this picture.

    • Sharon,

      Do not discount the probability that both Parties ARE in this together. This is exactly what Carrol Quigley said is happening in his book, Tragedy and Hope, and what we see can all be explained by this simply assertion. Besides, if “they” were this stupid, how do “they” even get elected? ;-)

Talk Amongst Yourselves:

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s