Now, for two years, I’ve offered a balanced approach to deficit reduction that would prevent these harmful cuts. I outlined it again last week at the State of the Union. I am willing to cut more spending that we don’t need, get rid of programs that aren’t working. I’ve laid out specific reforms to our entitlement programs that can achieve the same amount of health care savings by the beginning of the next decade as the reforms that were proposed by the bipartisan Simpson-Bowles commission. I’m willing to save hundreds of billions of dollars by enacting comprehensive tax reform that gets rid of tax loopholes and deductions for the well off and well connected, without raising tax rates.
So what has he actually proposed?
President Obama’s Record and Proposals for Cutting Spending
Jason Furman and Heather Higginbottom
December 11, 2012
03:20 PM EST
As part of his balanced approach to deficit reduction, the President has signed $1 trillion in discretionary spending cuts into law through the Budget Control Act, and his budget calls for more than $340 billion in entitlement savings from Medicare and Medicaid, and $250 billion from other mandatory programs.
THE PRESIDENT HAS SIGNED $1 TRILLION IN DISCRETIONARY CUTS INTO LAW AS PART OF THE BUDGET CONTROL ACT:
President Obama signed into law $1 trillion in cuts to discretionary spending over the next ten years. As part of the 2011 debt agreement the President cut $1,028 billion in discretionary spending through the Budget Control Act. Together with another $676 billion in discretionary savings through annual appropriations bills and interest savings, this will reduce spending by over $2 trillion. As a result, annual discretionary spending is projected to fall to its lowest levels on record, measured as a share of the economy.
A breakdown of these savings is in Table S-3 (pg 24) of the Mid-Session Review of the President’s Budget.
Furthermore, President Obama has proposed and signed into law the elimination of 77 government programs and cut another 52 programs, saving more than $30 billion annually. This includes taking a hard look at areas he thinks are very important to see what programs are not working, duplicative or no longer needed—which is why the Administration has eliminated 16 programs in the Department of Education, 10 programs at Health and Human Services, and 4 programs at the Department of Labor.
In addition, President Obama has cut or eliminated entitlements including cutting out the middleman in the student loan program to save $19 billion, reducing payments for abandoned mine land reclamation by almost $1 billion and eliminating the Telecommunications Development Fund, and a range of other policies.
THE PRESIDENT HAS PUT FORWARD SPECIFIC CUTS IN MANDATORY HEALTH SPENDING:
The President signed into law health savings in the Affordable Care Act that paid for the improving health coverage and reduced the deficit by over $100 billion over a decade. These policies contributed to slowing baseline growth in Medicare and Medicaid to that of GDP on a per capita basis. And, once its policies are fully phased in, the health care law slows the growth in national health spending.
The President has put forward detailed and specific health savings totaling more than $300 billion, all verified by the CBO in their March analysis of the President’s Budget. The health proposals in the President’s budget total to $340 billion according toCBO scoring ($362 billion in the original budget proposal the President put forward, reduced for some changes that went into effect). Some of the Medicare reforms include implementing new Medicare Part D drug rebates for drugs provided to low-income beneficiaries ($137 billion), reducing Medicare payments for bad debts ($24 billion), and increasing income-related premiums for higher-income beneficiaries in Medicare Parts B and D beginning in 2017 ($30 billion).
Larger long-term Medicare savings than Bowles-Simpson. President Obama’s reforms obtain savings from Medicare and Medicaid while protecting their fundamental structure. By 2022, the President’s Medicare proposals save $57 billion per year—slightly more than the $53 billion saved by the Bowles-Simpson proposal. Moreover, the President’s proposed health savings are still phasing in as of 2022, growing at more than 10 percent annually at the end of the window—compared to about 5 percent for Bowles-Simpson, suggesting that the President’s savings will exceed the Bowles-Simpson savings over the next decade.
AND PRESIDENT OBAMA HAS PROVIDED CONCRETE DETAIL ON SAVINGS FROM MANDATORY PROGRAMS OTHER THAN HEALTH:
The President’s budget sets out specific proposals to achieve $250 billion in savings — similar to the amount proposed by Bowles-Simpson — in entitlements and mandatory spending beyond health. Those specific savings include over $30 billion in agriculture subsidies, including ending direct farm payments; and $25 billion from strengthening the Post Office. (See table S-10).
UNDER PRESIDENT OBAMA’S WATCH SPENDING GREW AT THE SLOWEST PACE SINCE EISENHOWER:
Under President Obama’s watch, spending—including the emergency measures in the Recovery Act—grew at the slowest pace since Eisenhower, and far lower than President Reagan’s first term. In the President’s time in office, federal spending has grown at 1.4 percent per year, the slowest pace since Eisenhower, and far lower than the 8.7 percent in President Reagan’s first term.
This analysis has been confirmed by other fact checkers. On May 22, 2012, responding to claims that spending under President Obama had accelerated rapidly, PolitiFact wrote that “Obama has indeed presided over the slowest growth in spending of any president using raw dollars, and it was the second-slowest if you adjust for inflation.”
Jason Furman is Assistant to the President for Economic Policy and Principal Deputy Director of the National Economic Council. Heather Higginbottom is the Deputy Director of the Office of Management and Budget.
One trillion over 10 years equals 100 billion per year that includes:
- 30 billion a year in cuts in eliminated and reduced programs.
- It is dishonest to claim savings in the student loan program because the recipients of those loans paid that money, not the government plus the government now has to do the work that SallieMae used to do…and the student loan default rates have skyrocketed, putting the taxpayer on the hook for those bad debts, so I would have to give that one a zero.
- Abandoned mine land reclamation cuts? This is a program funded by fees on coal production that are assessed to coal companies and redistributed to the states doing remediation – this is another example of a sham cut because the government is only acting as a “middle man” and passing these funds on. This one gets a zero as well.
- Obamacare – which we are learning every day will cut nothing and add cost through $50 billion a year of increased taxes, higher medical costs and more lost jobs, so we can charitably give this a zero.
So that’s $100 billion a year in “cuts” against total spending of roughly $3.8 trillion in 2013. That’s a “cut” of 2.6% – if it was real. The Congressional Budget Office indicates in their baseline budget forecast that it expects government spending to increase 167% over the next 10 years! They are stating that spending will grow from $3.553 trillion in 2013 to $5.939 trillion in 2023.
The last line about the spending rate reduction only works if you do not count the 2009 fiscal year which included programs that the then Senator Obama voted for. The Washington Post and the AP actually called out PolitFact’s biased “fact check” on this lie.
So Obama’s spending rate record is a lie and his “cuts” are worthless – except as political fodder – because government continues to grow and voraciously consume resources.
It is all an illusion folks. Pure and unadulterated propaganda.
Obama is an expert politician – but unfortunately for the American people, it also means that he is also an expert demagogue and a blatant liar.