Fisking Robert Fisk…Again.

The Urban Dictionary defines “fisking” as:

The word is derived from articles written by Robert Fisk that were easily refuted, and refers to a point-by-point debunking of lies and/or idiocies.

Robert Fisk is a notoriously biased and sloppy “journalist”. According to Wikipedia, the term “Fisking” was coined by bloggers in December 2001, following a three-paragraph response by Andrew Sullivan to an article Fisk wrote for The Independent on Sunday earlier that month. In the piece, Fisk recounted a beating which he received at the hands of Afghan refugees in Pakistan and said that, given their experiences, which included having recently lost relatives in a B52 bombing and having seen television footage of the massacre of prisoners at Mazar-i-Sharif, he could understand why they would have treated him or any other westerner that way and that, in their position, he would have behaved similarly. Sullivan quoted and responded to passages from the Fisk piece, but not in a complete, line-by-line format. He described Fisk’s excusal of his attackers as a form of left-wing racism. The term fisking was first applied soon after on Instapundit and Sullivan’s blog.

Well, Fisk still writes for The Independent and is just as biased and clueless as he was in 2001. Writing about the tragic massacre in Afghanistan he states:

I’m getting a bit tired of the “deranged” soldier story. It was predictable, of course. The 38-year-old staff sergeant who massacred 16 Afghan civilians, including nine children, near Kandahar this week had no sooner returned to base than the defence experts and the think-tank boys and girls announced that he was “deranged”. Not an evil, wicked, mindless terrorist – which he would be, of course, if he had been an Afghan, especially a Taliban – but merely a guy who went crazy.

This was the same nonsense used to describe the murderous US soldiers who ran amok in the Iraqi town of Haditha. It was the same word used about Israeli soldier Baruch Goldstein who massacred 25 Palestinians in Hebron – something I pointed out in this paper only hours before the staff sergeant became suddenly “deranged” in Kandahar province.


Seven of the eight Marines charged in the alleged “massacre” of 24 civilians in the Iraqi town of Haditha in 2005 have been acquitted or had their charges dismissed. The eighth? Convicted of dereliction of duty and discharged.

Israeli soldier Baruch Goldstein who massacred 25 Palestinians in Hebron?

Goldstein did murder Palestinians in the Cave of the Patriarchs massacre but he was not a member of Israeli military. He was actually part of the Jewish Defense League, a group identified by the FBI as a terrorist organization.

Fisk continues to ply his trade in conveniently excusing groups that he aligns with, not saying a word about the American soldiers assassinated by the Taliban after the accidental Koran burnings in Afghanistan or the terror attacks against Afghan civilians. I guess he can understand why they would be mad at us…

Yet another member of the Society for Progressive Alchemy, I guess…

Maggie joins in the fisking fun…

7 thoughts on “Fisking Robert Fisk…Again.

  1. Our soldiers, our kids and brothers and sisters, are considered invaders by many, if not by now most, Afghanis. When they kill our soldiers, they are defending their country, just as I hope everyone reading this would do here in America, were roles reversed. Our soldiers are fair game, their citizens are not, or why in Sam Hill are we there?
    I read that bales, the alleged cowardly slimeball, wanted to become a recruiter. He succeeded in That endeavor, only for the wrong side.

    • So leave them to the Taliban, that’s your answer?

      We are the invaders. We invaded to eliminate a threat to our country and to liberate a people mired in 7th century societies where women are chattel, where men can bugger little boys but “out of the closet” gays are stoned to death and little girls are raped and then forced to marry their rapists.

      I don’t regret our losses, I regret that we dishonor those losses, their families and their service by not allowing our troops to meet savagery with greater savagery to end it once and for all.

      It amazes me how easily you slip into moral relativism to justify terrorism. In this case you are exactly like Robert Fisk.

      I suppose you can understand why the Twin Towers were brought down, too… because that is the argument you are putting forward.

      Did we deserve that?

  2. Pingback: Robert Fisk Needs Less Time Journaling in Middle East: Hezbollah Apologist Zings US Military – Tired of Madness! | Maggie's Notebook

  3. “So leave them to the Taliban, that’s your answer?”

    Yep. But I agree with you. We have the military might to call it a day in, well….. a day. Retaliation for 9/11 should’ve been swift and harsh.

    I regret our losses. I regret the losses of those in the crossfire.

    M., you know and I know that it’s not our job to “save” the world. It is probably in our best interest, though, because if Democracy and Capitalism spreads, people get a taste of it and become less of a threat. (Probably cause they will have left their poppy fields and started becoming productive citizens)

    I really have no idea why we didn’t just go over there and open up a bunch of fast-food joints. Woulda been peaceful, and we could’ve called it a day.

    But do they skate? I’m thinkin on Sonic and my beloved BLT’s…..

  4. Pingback: Does Obama know he’s fighting on al-Qa’ida’s side? | The Rio Norte Line

Talk Amongst Yourselves:

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.