We Are No Longer Governed, We Are Ruled

Note that we talked about the plight of private citizens who were attacked by the EPA a while back (Sackett v. The EPA), but now from blogger Eric at Classical Values, comes this:

In a story that would be touching in the ordinary context, an 88 year old man and his 85 year old girlfriend built a portable water purification business from a dream to a reality. Nothing wrong there; such things are supposed to be part of the American Dream.

But now, their business is being ruined by one of the most unaccountable and tyrannical bureaucracies in the history of government, the DEA:

88-year-old Bob Wallace, and his 85-year-old girlfriend, Marjorie Ottenberg fell in love 35 years ago backpacking to the tops of the highest peaks in the world.

Wallace is a Stanford educated engineer and Ottenberg is a former chemist and decades ago they came up with a water purification product for backpackers like themselves called Polar Pure out of their garage in Saratoga, Calif.

“For an old guy with nothing else to do, this is something that keeps us occupied,” says Wallace.

Today, Wallace and Ottenberg are fighting the Drug Enforcement Administration and state officials to continue to operate their business. Why? The DEA says that drug dealers are using their product to make methamphetamine.

The DEA says meth heads are interested in Polar Pure’s key ingredient, iodine crystals.

Too lazy to go after the meth heads, they have to go after perfectly legitimate business, destroying the dream of two honest elderly Americans. You don’t have to be opposed to the Drug War to be opposed to such tyranny.

Wallace and Ottenberg’s business will of course be ruined, because they cannot possibly comply with the laws demands that they pay huge regulatory fees, plus “register with the state and feds, report any suspicious activity and keep track of each and ever person who bought a bottle of their product.”  Nor can their customers, which included camping stores and online outlets that stocked their product. They are being wiped out, and the DEA dismissively calls this “collateral damage”:

Instead of dealing with the new regulations they just dropped the product, effectively killing Wallace and Ottenberg’s business.

“Any time you deal with a government it’s a hassle,” says Ottenberg.

A spokeswoman for the DEA told the San Jose Mercury News that Wallace was “collateral damage.”

I suppose I could ask just what provision of the Constitution gives the DEA the power to shut down dealers in iodine. After all, I ask these questions all the time.

To no avail. We are no longer governed, but we are ruled. This government is monstrous. It no longer resembles what the founders envisioned, and very few people care. Those who do are ridiculed as cranks.

Let them eat cake. That’s the message.

Let them eat cake.

I still hold that this “progressive”, overweening national government is just the modern manifestation of a 16th century monarchy.

How much longer will people go on passively as it becomes clearer and clearer to rational citizens that our government has nothing but contempt for us? How much longer will those who support this brand of tyranny give up slices of their liberty in exchange for a few bread crumbs and some gub’mint cheese?

I don’t think it will be much longer. For me, the benchmark is this year’s election. If Obama wins, America is done. If Obama loses by a slim margin, America is still done – because a powerful leftist media will relentlessly spin it as just another “temper tantrum” by an uninformed electorate – that we really were just mad that Obama just didn’t destroy the Constitution faster because we really, deep-down, in our heart of hearts, liked his agenda.

The only sign of life for freedom loving Americans will be a clear and decisive repudiation via a Republican victory.

Via Sarah Hoyt, who is guest-blogging at Instapundit while the Professor is on vakay.

4 thoughts on “We Are No Longer Governed, We Are Ruled

  1. The only sign of life for freedom loving Americans will be a clear and decisive repudiation via a Republican victory.

    Republican victory??? I was with you – right up to this point. An “R” does not change anything – especially when the man running with that “R” is little different from Obama. We demand others take Obama at his word, yet here we go again – excusing Romney for the words he has said and never retracted. Or is it going to be OK if Romney “evolves on the issues” as Bush did?

    No, we need to soundly defeat Obama, but just electing the “R” is NOT going to solve our problem – just make us think we have. Then the Progs in BOTH Parties will just go on merrily doing what they do as they have been for decades now and nothing will change.

    The answer is in defeating the 2-Party system and abolishing ALL artificial entities – Parties included.

      • I acknowledged that, and even said we have to defeat Obama. But I object to the suggestion that electing the “R” ends the problem and ‘saves’ us. It doesn’t. It is just the first step in what is going to be a long, hard struggle – a struggle I’m not so sure we are prepared to face.

  2. I think people are gradually waking up to the fact that our government is overbearing and corrupt. Maybe we will see some serious changes coming down the pike.

Talk Amongst Yourselves:

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.