Have you ever read someone comment that they are dismissing something because of the source? You know: they claim that nothing on FOX News or the Huffington Post could possibly be true because of the supposed bias of these organizations. Never mind that this is a fallacious line of reasoning, let’s just for the sake of argument, let’s accept these assertions. Now, let’s apply it to the question about whether or not Obama is a Marxist (and remember, ALL of this was known to the media BEFORE the 2008 elections):
There is a new book out that details who Obama’s childhood mentor was and what he believed and it clearly demonstrates that Obama’s mentor was a Marxist:
It exposes who Frank Marshal Davis is and what he believed:
There is a movie about this man and his relationship with Obama called Obama’s America 2016. The Blaze had a story about it:
Exclusive: See This Clip About Obama‘s Relationship With Communist Frank Marshall Davis From Dinesh D’Souza‘s ’2016′ Film
After reading this book, you will quickly see that a large part of who Obama is came directly from Davis. For example, Obama got the Communist saying “Forward” from Davis:
However, these same people who tell us that we can’t trust what we hear from the supposed “biased” sources they dislike will actually defend Obama from these “accusations.” But there is a problem for these people: Obama’s mentor is actually teaching a Harvard class on understanding Obama. Now, how could he do that unless he knows why Obama is the way he is?
Now, I realize that even this will have no effect on these people: they are impervious to the truth — yet, they will claim they are speaking the truth. They will also object to the fact that I am citing only The Blaze in my post. Well, setting aside the fact that The Blaze is one of the few remaining AMERICAN sources of true journalism, I chose the examples of FOX News and the Huffington post at the beginning of this post for a reason: The Blaze is owned by Glenn Beck, a former FOX News personality; but it is run by the former head of the Huffington Post. So, how is it that these supposedly opposing ideological personalities could come together to present these stories unless there is a great deal of truth to them?
There is a lot of misinformation about Obama being pushed by the “Main Stream Media” today, and The Blaze has done a great job of exposing it and separating fact from fiction:
So, if you accept the claims that a person’s associations and ideology bias them, then you must accept that Obama was heavily biased by his Communist mentor. However, if you are rational, and you prefer to hear the evidence – ALL of the available evidence – and then make up your own mind, then, if you go through all of the information presented in the links I posted, you must accept that Obama has been heavily influenced by his Communist mentor. Either way you look at it, a rational, intellectually honest person would be forced to admit that the best evidence available to us indicates that Obama is most likely a Communist and/or is pursuing a Communist agenda through his Presidency.
As all of this was known to the media before the election, and because they hid it, such a conclusion would also force one to accept that the media acted in a treasonous manner – as Communism is antithetical to America and individual liberty.
Humbly submitted for your consideration and in sincere hope that you will give some thought to my words. Thanks for reading and God bless.