Unless this nation totally abandons the rule of law, Obama is not going to be able to get away with Benghazigate. This IS treason, and the story is finally starting to find its way into the main stream media. Now, to be sure, they are not calling it treason — yet — but, if Obama was arming the Libyan rebels as it now appears, that is exactly what this is: treason!
GAFFNEY: The real reason behind Benghazigate
Was Obama gun-walking arms to jihadists?
Thanks to intrepid investigative reporting — notably by Bret Baier and Catherine Herridge at Fox News, Aaron Klein at WND.com and Clare Lopez at RadicalIslam.org — and information developed by congressional investigators, the mystery is beginning to unravel with regard to what happened that night and the reason for the subsequent, clumsy official cover-up now known as Benghazigate.
The evidence suggests that the Obama administration has not simply been engaging, legitimating, enriching and emboldening Islamists who have taken over or are ascendant in much of the Middle East. Starting in March 2011, when American diplomat J. Christopher Stevens was designated the liaison to the “opposition” in Libya, the Obama administration has been arming them, including jihadists like Abdelhakim Belhadj, leader of the al Qaeda franchise known as the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group.
Read more: GAFFNEY: The real reason behind Benghazigate – Washington Times
“…including jihadists like Abdelhakim Belhadj, leader of the al Qaeda franchise…”
THAT, ladies and gentlemen, is the classic, Constitutional definition of treason. It should be treated as such. Pretending that we are “too serious” or “too responsible” to call it what it is is neither serious nor responsible: it’s cowardice or/or complicity.