Gun Control: Obama and the Red Chinese Agree!

Communist Chinese Government Calls For Americans to be Disarmed

The Communist Chinese government, via its state-run media front Xinhua, has called for Americans to be disarmed, arguing that the Sandy Hook school massacre demands “no delay for U.S. gun control.”

When the government that does this to citizens who simply want their GOD-GIVEN individual rights and liberties tells you Americans need to be disarmed:


And our own President essentially agrees, then you know that this can’t be far behind:





Are you ready to discuss secession YET?!

12 thoughts on “Gun Control: Obama and the Red Chinese Agree!

  1. When the USA defaults on the debt to China and the US Government begins to pay back the Chinese with our property and assets, I am sure they would prefer no armed resistance. Don’t you agree?

    • Ken,

      If that’s the way it goes down, yes. But I would expect the idiots in the Fed to just “digitize” their repayments (essentially making our money worthless). then they will “reconstitute” our “new” currency (and govt) using our property as collateral instead of gold (they already own it).

      This is essentially what Hitler did, and we have been on the same path as 1930′ Germany for a while now — and in more ways than I’d care to admit.

  2. The rate of gun ownership in the US is 88.8 firearms per 100 people. The rate in Israel is 7.3 per 100 people. In Israel, no one gets a gun unless they can show good reason why they need one, and they have to renew the license every six months. Living in the settlements makes one eligible, but little else. I would have thought that there would be more guns than that in the hands of private citizens in such a violent area.
    The US has a rate of gun ownership per capita that is 12 times greater that of Israel, but we have only twice as many murders, we are 24th** on a list of the countries with the most homicides per capita, 4.4 per 100k people to Israel’s 2.2 per 100k.. Either we are, on the whole, lousy shots, or we use other means of disposal,or a gun-possessing population really does act as a deterrent. I vote for #3. I did not parse the methods of murder, but I do not believe that would affect the standings of either country to any significant degree..


    • Good points, Greg. I think that one of the most important aspects of this issue — and one many seem to miss or are unwilling to admit to — is that the weapon one uses is usually a matter of convenience. What seems to be most at issue is the degree of decay within a given society which then leads people to want to murder in the first place. Once that point is crossed, it doesn’t matter whether guns are available or not, a person intent on doing harm will find a way to do that harm.

Talk Amongst Yourselves:

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s