Global Warming, Rush Limbaugh, Political Correctness and Monkeys

Did that title catch your attention?  Are you wondering what Global Warming, Rush Limbaugh, Political Correctness and Monkeys have in common?  Well, a better question would be, “Are YOU a monkey?”  Let me explain.  Have you seen this story?

Rush Limbaugh gives young global warming denier a free iPad

Whether you believe global warming is anthropogenic or not, there is solid evidence to support the assertion that the man-made global warming issue has been intentionally manufactured so as to provide the political agenda behind it with a hammer with which to beat people into submission.

But it gets better.  The people behind this global warming hoax are well aware of what they are doing.  In fact, to them, it’s a science and you are the monkey.  If you believe that “science” has “proven” that global warming is real and that it is man-made, you are a monkey.  If you attack people who disagree with the assertion that global warming is man-made, if you think they are “deniers,” then you are a monkey who has been intentionally conditioned to do the work of the people behind the hoax.

Why do I say this?  Because the people behind the global warming hoax think making you into a monkey is nothing more than “science.”  The science they are using can be found in this study:

Did the monkey banana and water spray experiment ever take place?

The Monkey Banana and Water Spray Experiment
The experiment is real (scientific study cited below). This experiment involved 5 monkeys (10 altogether, including replacements), a cage, a banana, a ladder and, an ice cold water hose.

The Experiment- Part 1
5 monkeys are locked in a cage, a banana was hung from the ceiling and a ladder was placed right underneath it.
As predicted, immediately, one of the monkeys would race towards the ladder, to grab the banana. However, as soon as he would start to climb, the researcher would spray the monkey with ice-cold water.
but here’s the kicker- In addition, he would also spray the other four monkeys…

When a second monkey tried to climb the ladder, the researcher would, again, spray the monkey with ice-cold water, As well as the other four watching monkeys;
This was repeated again and again until they learned their lesson
Climbing equals scary cold water for EVERYONE so No One Climbs the ladder.

The Experiment- Part 2
Once the 5 monkeys knew the drill, the researcher replaced one of the monkeys with a new inexperienced one. As predicted, the new monkey spots the banana, and goes for the ladder. BUT, the other four monkeys, knowing the drill, jumped on the new monkey and beat him up. The beat up new guy thus Learns- NO going for the ladder and No Banana Period- without even knowing why! and also without ever being sprayed with water!

These actions get repeated with 3 more times, with a new monkey each time and ASTONISHINGLY each new monkey- who had never received the cold-water Spray himself (and didn’t even know anything about it), would Join the beating up of the New guy.

This is a classic example of Mob Mentality- bystanders and outsiders uninvolved with the fight- join in ‘just because’.

When the researcher replaced a third monkey, the same thing happened; likewise for the fourth until, eventually, all the monkeys had been replaced and none of the original ones are left in the cage (that had been sprayed by water).

The Experiment- Part 3
Again, a new monkey was introduced into the cage. It ran toward the ladder only to get beaten up by the others. The monkey turns with a curious face asking “why do you beat me up when I try to get the banana?”
The other four monkeys stopped and looked at each other puzzled (None of them had been sprayed and so they really had no clue why the new guy can’t get the banana) but it didn’t matter, it was too late, the rules had been set. And So, although they didn’t know WHY, they beat up the monkey just because ” that’s the way we do things around here”…


The process is simple:

Establish politically acceptable beliefs and attitudes.

Tell people they are free to disagree because they have freedom of speech.

When they disagree, beat the snot out of them and everyone else who might possibly agree with them – whether they actually agree or not.

(Here’s where we modify the monkey study just a bit) When people start to attack those who speak out against the politically accepted norms, reward them while still beating the snot out of the ‘radical’ and everyone else that remains silent.

Repeat until everyone starts to beat the snot out of anyone who gets outside the politically correct lines.

What the heck do you think Orwell’s 1984 and Huxley’s Brave New World are all about?

So, are you a monkey or not?  If not, then stop acting like one!!!

10 thoughts on “Global Warming, Rush Limbaugh, Political Correctness and Monkeys

  1. I think you mean ‘anthropogenic’. But, come to think of it, it is sold in an anthropomorphic way, isn’t it?

  2. you have such a huge victim complex. You act like global warming deniers are being beaten and imprisoned. You call Obama a dictator and yet you are not in prison for posting anti-Obama images.

    • I call Obama what he is, and I have made the case that he meets the definition — which is why no one has ever opposed me with anything more than unsupported assertions of OPINIONS!

      And, no, I do not have any feeling of victimhood. That is a peculiarity common to the left. You’ve admitted to it yourself — many times. What I am doing is helping to show people how many seemingly unrelated things are actually connected and being used to shape and direct public opinion. And it works. It has worked on you. I’m just trying to help people understand how it happens/works and — if people like you would just try to understand — I might even be able to open a door through which you can escape the prison in which you’ve assigned yourself.

    • Karl …. Caged Monkeys are known to throw their Feces at people in fits of rage.

      You are caged by your grasping to the Porpaganda you’ve been taught.

      For instance “Global warming deniers” is a Slogan….which when used IMPLIES that the term is true…..and at the same time becomes an invective …..a Green “N-Word” if you will to be hurled (Thrown) at others. The science does NOT show anything but normal temperature change. in fact a leveling of a Temp range for the past 12 years.

      When one is IN prison one doesn’t have the Chance to Protest … one doesn’t buy Insurance AFTER they’ve died.

      • Don,

        Those little buggers don’t have to be in a cage to throw their poop. They do it in the wild, too. But it is amazing how quickly a judicially placed 5.56 mm “accidental discharge” rectifies the rain of feces 😉

  3. Create a crisis and then ask people to pay for it. Pretty much encapsulates the anthropogenic global warming bandwagon.

    There is no doubt on either side of the debate that Mankind, particularly since the industrial revolution, has emitted a tremendous quantity of Carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. This is a plain FACT. No one disputes this.

    What is contended is the effect and impact of this extra C02 in the atmosphere that Mankind has directly contributed toward. This is where the debate truly opens up. In other words, are current temperatures within the range of natural variability or outside of it?

    It is important to note beforehand, however, that even though the human race has emitted vast amounts of CO2 into the atmosphere (since the Industrial Revolution) – this fact alone doesn’t really explain anything. For example, it is important to remember that there is no such thing as an ‘optimal climate’ is precisely the same way as there is no such thing as a ‘standard climate’. Despite the fact that since the Industrial Revolution vast quantities of C02 have been released by humankind – it is equally important to understand that one is reasoning on the assumption that prior to Industrialisation since a thing as a ‘normal climate’ existed.

    As for computer models trying to predict future climate states. This is absolutely impossible. Computer models are a very useful scientific tool and serve many theoretical and practical purposes, but that’s where it ends folks – PERIOD! The models can attempt to predict future climate scenarios by means of the information that is programmed into them, but this does not constitute EVIDENCE or PROOF! Unless we have perfect knowledge of how all of the earth’s systems operate, including solar influences, then any conclusion derived by the models will be incomplete and biased. One cannot make predictions to any meaningful degree unless ALL of the known and unknown elements which drive climate and fully comprehended.

Talk Amongst Yourselves:

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.