I’m sorry, but this one is too important to pass up or make light, so this is a serious post. In one of my comments to Karl, I pointed out that the Capitalist must be part of the collective, and, therefore, for the workers to work against the Capitalist is for the collective to work against itself. To which, Karl replied:
You imply China is communist and/or socialist.
The capitalist are not members of the collective since their property is not controlled collectively, but privately. The struggle for socialism is to collectivize the means of production, which also creates collective consciousness and action.
So, Karl is telling us that there is no room for the Capitalist/Bourgeoisie in the collective while, at the same time, asserting that the ultimate ends of mankind is this supposed “collective.” So, I ask you, if the collective is the ultimate end for human evolution, and there is no room for the Capitalist/Bourgeoisie in this collective, then what is to be done with them?
Now, as soon as he sees what he has implied, there’s little doubt that Karl will deny it. But how can he? Where has he ever allowed for the incorporation of the Capitalist into the collective? Where did Karl Marx, or Lenin or Stalin or Mao allow for it? They didn’t, and neither does Comrade Karl. And THAT, ladies and gentlemen, is the evil inherent in EVERY Marxist movement: they have to liquidate their opposition because they have nothing that addresses what to do with them, or how to fit them into the collective. Now, I would urge you to consider that Obama and the majority of those people he has placed in higher positions in his Administration, as well as the people who head up the many private Progressive organizations his Administration coordinates with are all connected to Bill Ayres, and Bill Ayres was at the highest level of leadership in the movement that considered doing just this – liquidating as many as 25 million Americans:
Obama and his wife WILLINGLY align and ally themselves with Ayres. No doubt, if Ayres beliefs were pointed out, just like Karl, the Obamas would no doubt deny they share his beliefs. But they know what Ayres believes — and I say believes because Ayres has never recanted – quite the contrary. He has said he wishes he had done more. So the prudent assumption would be that Obama and this Administration actually do harbor some sense of liquidation for their political enemies. To dismiss such a possibility is to walk blindly down the same road the German people traveled in the 1930’s.