RNL reader, James McPherson, made the discussion of a post he has tried to hijack for his own attention:
“…All of my comments for the past couple of days were prompted by a post — written by Dusty, commented favorably on by Joe, “liked” by Utah, and missed by you — that was blatantly false (as should have been obvious)…”
The problem here is that James is saying something that is blatantly FALSE – which makes this an intentional LIE! Whether SBJ agreed with Dusty’s post or not is a matter of opinion, but the post was about something that has been all over the media world for some time now – that the Left has turned and is continuing to turn on Obama:
Politicians and mainstream media turn against the president
From the Washington Times:
Liberals plotting a challenger rather than sticking by a failed leader
From The Blaze:
From FOX News:
And these are from just PART of the FIRST PAGE of a Google search!!! That makes the claim that the Left has not turned on Obama a LIE — not an opinion.
You see, what we have in James is an over-educated person with an inferiority complex and an ego that he cannot control. But he knows enough to know he and everything he has supported and advocated his whole life is obviously wrong because the world sees it all falling apart. So, rather than have the humility and honesty to admit his mistake and seek forgiveness, and rather than switch his positions to pursue truth, SBJ chooses to attack people and call them liars when the truth of what they are saying can be found with a simple Google search.
No, I have no doubt SBJ (James McPherson) will try to pick on a VERY narrow aspect of Dusty’s post and attack that thinking he can make his point, but he can’t. It is fallacious to assume you have defeated a truthful assertion just because you have undermined the illustration. This is also why SBJ does his best to side-track discussions: because he cannot defend his position against the argument in the post, so all he has is mud throwing. In essence, he is doing on the RNL what the ANTI-DEMOCRATS in Texas did when they shouted down the People’s house over the abortion bill.
When we boil it all down, what we have in SBJ is the best example we could ask for to illustrate that Limbaugh is correct about ‘liberals:’ they are angry, little people who would rather destroy ALL of civilization than see it NOT turned into THEIR personal utopian idea of how things ought to be.
Now, remember: this man, James, represents the average college professor taking your money to teach your child and place you BOTH in debt to the government through the student loan scam.
This is the original post to which SBJ has been referring:
This is what the original post says:
Finally, Matt Patterson and Newsweek speak out about Obama. This is timely and tough. As many of you know, Newsweek has a reputation for being extremely liberal. The fact that their editor saw fit to print the following article about Obama and the one that appears in the latest Newsweek, makes this a truly amazing event, and a news story in and of itself. At last, the truth about our President and his agenda are starting to trickle through the “protective wall” built around him by the liberal media….
The original post refers to 2 different articles AND posts a picture of Obama with the title “Hit the Road, Barack.” This is an attack on Obama, and it is on the cover of Newsweek. Newsweek is a Left-leaning publication. Case in point:
So, again, any way this one is sliced (spun), SBJ shows he is a stranger to the truth.