Probably My Last Post On Zimmerman

I can’t add anything to two posts that I just read. I rarely link to HuffPo because they are usually reflexively liberal on pretty much everything, maybe one in a hundred posts is even close to the middle – but this one by a black actor, Romany Malco, is very good:

I haven’t touched on the Trayvon Martin issue because race matters in this country are the paralysis of the American people. To constructively discuss Trayvon would require empathy, introspection and an understanding of America’s social and economic history. This is why the open forums we have seen thus far seem to fuel more ignorance and bias than reasonable debate.

To be brutally honest, the only reason people are even aware of Trayvon Martin is because it became a topic within mainstream news and pop culture. Meaning: News directors saw it as a profitable, sensational story. Hundreds of blacks die annually in South Side Chicago without even a blurb. Trayvon isn’t in the mainstream news for any reason other than ratings and profit. The news coverage on the Zimmerman case almost implies that the killing of this young black man is somehow an anomaly and I resent that.

In this country, if it isn’t streamlined through mainstream media and pop culture, it doesn’t seem to warrant national debate. Our “government” continues to wreak havoc on our civil liberties and there is little to no protest from the black community because of media diversion tactics that keep such pertinent issues out of mainstream media. But if Jay-Z or Rihanna were to make mention of it, we’d suddenly be jolted out of our sugar comas and protesting on freeways.

My point being, people are up in arms about Trayvon based on regurgitated pundits and manipulated facts aired to elicit emotion while fueling America’s anger and division. That’s how you boost ratings. No different from Piers Morgan’s desperate rant over gun control when he knew his ratings were in the dumps. And from where I stand, anyone who still relies on corporate-owned media pundits to support an argument isn’t equipped to offer worthwhile solutions.

There is another at a legal blog called The Faculty Lounge that is also very, very good and touches on what I was trying to communicate about people who are yelling and screaming in support of what they believe, only that what they believe is based on a bunch of lies and willful ignorance:

I have been struck by the frequency with which many commenting on this case, including the public on social media — but also journalists, scholars, and lawyers, all of whom should prize fidelity to facts — have made bald, confident assertions, often without citing any evidence, and sometimes in direct contradiction to the available evidence. This is all the more startling in light of the egregious editing of Zimmerman’s call to police the night of the shooting made early on in the reporting of the case by NBC, which is the subject of a defamation lawsuit by Zimmerman.

An almost equally egregious error continues to be made by those who cite, in support of the proposition that GZ is clearly a racist, the “fact” that he racially profiled a seven-year-old black boy, calling 911 to report the child’s suspicious behavior. When George Mason Law Prof. David Bernstein read this claim repeated by a fellow law prof on a listserv (see part VI), it struck him as so implausible an action for any non-insane individual to have taken that he spent one minute with Google and discovered what should not be surprising to anyone who hasn’t already committed to a narrative of that night and decided that they have GZ’s number: it’s just flat wrong (more below). Shortly after reading Bernstein’s post, I myself encountered a law professor perpetuating the same myth, this time in a serious, edited publication, The New Republic (emphasis in original):

. . . Zimmerman was an edgy basket case with a gun who had called 911 46 times in 15 months, once to report the suspicious activities of a seven year old black boy.

As Bernstein notes, the confusion seems to be the result of carelessness by The Daily Beast, followed by reliance by other journalists, scholars, and lawyers on The Daily Beast rather than on primary sources readily available on the Internet.

…I meant to note that the tendency to see facts through various lenses — whether their own experiences, their scholarly areas of expertise, or an ideology — does not make people evil. It makes them human. Without swallowing postmodernism hook, line, and sinker, in some very real sense it’s impossible not to approach events through one or more lenses. Indeed, “intellectual conflicts of interests” (as I vaguely group varying tendencies to ignore or distort fact) has become a scholarly fascination of mine, and that is one very strong lens through which I admittedly view commentary about the Zimmerman trial. So we all do it, and sometimes those lenses are valuable and help us see things that others don’t (see, e.g., the wise Latina). But sometimes, of course, they obfuscate. The important thing for everyone, but especially for journalists, lawyers, and scholars, is to strive for as much intellectual honesty, open-mindedness to reconsidering one’s position, and a hermeneutics of charity when hearing others’s views as is consistent with the fact of human finitude and fallibility (told you I have a humanities Ph.D.). Kudos to several law profs who have done just this in the context of some very difficult and painful conversations, including Tamar Birkhead.

15 thoughts on “Probably My Last Post On Zimmerman

  1. As with all things politics, all one has to do is to follow the money. The likes of the mainstream media, the NAACP, Al Sharpton, Jessie Jackson, Rev Wright, and yes even Barack Obama all feed like hyenas on the tragedy of the Martin family and profit, while the parents sit in their home suffering, and gracefully begging Americans to not make this about race.
    (I personally have not seen them doing different Don, but I struck it all the same. I’ll look into later activity of theirs since I have not looked since the trial ended. Fair enough?)

    But by God, it will be about race.

    Sadly, we have a generation of politicians on both sides of the aisle that will prostitute themselves for financial and political gain. The same holds true for the media. They will continue to seize upon this human tragedy and opportunistically ride this for the long haul … as long as it makes them a buck.

    None of these people ever truly gave a shit about Trayvon Martin, or his parents.

    Thank God that just a few, a very small few, still hold on to the now antiquated value of honesty, and honest reporting.

    • The Parents aren’t sitting at home Gracefully…..they are out at rallies actively rabble-rousing.

      They gave lip-service to it NOT being about race…..but Both their speeches were about nothing but race !!

  2. Unfortunately, non of the above will get any major coverage, and will die a quiet death, while Sharpie and Jackson keep on truckin on the evening news.

  3. This is a Great send-up for L’Affaire Zimmerman. However I fear you will be Forced by mis-fortune to post again…… the Black Racists have their issue for the moment.

    I read her whole article and found it quite refreshing……but one monor point at the End.

    I disagree with Michele Meyer about the Tendency to see facts through one’s various Lenses NOT making one Evil……when that Lense , that interpretation is used for more than mere dialogue or Reportage…….When it indeed is used as a Lense for J’Accuse, or for the dismantling of the Countries legal structure or for the further breakdown of the Civil Society….it is then the very fedinition of Evil.

  4. IF this blog author is summarizing material from an original and reliable source, then I have to ask, where is the racial outrage over this? This is about as close to replicating this whole Trayvon Martin thing as I have seen, where the racial roles were reversed. Guess what? SAME OUTCOME BIOTCHES! All antagonization aside. We have a very similar case where the black man was found not guilty. Yet, as the author writes, nothing in the headlines.

    • Liber,

      The Cervini case is Amazingly similar….and UNKNOWN !…………Obama himself mentioned that IF there was a case with the races reversed the outcome would have ALSO been reversed……and HERE he is proved wrong…..and NOONE is calling him on it.

      This Shows the Bankruptcy and Propaganda that is the Main Stream Press.

      It a way I am glad Whites aren’t rioting….I wouldn’t expect us to. But I wish whites were Talking, and Marching……and LOUDLY proclaiming against what is going on. Ultimately ALL should be marching against the Theft of our Constitutional rights and against Washington Spending .

      • Exactly Don! Trayvon Martin apologists have been trying to raise this argument for over a week. Well, now we have a case, so why are the results just about the same? Could it just be that maybe our criminal justice system isn’t as racist as they would like it to be?

      • At the beginning of the investigation, before the trial, the FBI looked very hard and diligently for any signs of racism from Zimmerman and after looking at all the facts, they concluded that there was absolutely no grounds to go after Zimmerman on civil rights violations. The FBI told the DOJ they would be beating a dead horse to try.

        But there is, however, the ability of the Martin family to sue Zimmerman for wrongful death ala O.J. Simpson.

        • And, I believe there was a 14 month investigation , maybe 18 months… it was very thorough.

          The problem with the analogy to OJ is that Nicole Brown and Goldman were Attacked and murdered ….there was no confrontation….in other words OJ and his Son STALKED them and killed them.

          Zimmerman was the one attacked and defended himself, and was in contact with 911 not hiding in the Bushes. It would seem to me HE might have some grounds for a Civil suit against the estate of Martin.

  5. I wonder If all those Arizonans who voted for the “Silly old Dolt” McCain are proud of his comments on the case. Talking about how racist we all are ( not Blacks of course).

    He’s so silly……can’t wait til he retires… maybe in 14 years or whenever he decides too…..oh Well he’s just a Dolt. But he’s a Good Republican…….and that’s what matters.

Talk Amongst Yourselves:

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.