Have you heard that the U.S. Government tried a case in which it presented documentation into evidence where a major American Islamic branch of the Muslim Brotherhood flat stated its goal was to overthrow our Constitution from within? Why do you suppose that is? Could it have anything to do with Obama’s ties to the Muslim Brotherhood? Or the media to Obama and the agenda for which he stands? Well, it’s true: there has been such a trial and this evidence was presented in court. It is all a matter of public record now. The trial was the United States v. Holy Land Foundation in 2008.
A document written in 1991 by Mohammad Alram, a senior Hamas leader residing in the U.S. and member of the Board of Directors of the Muslim Brotherhood in North America. The court summary reads as follows:
“The document makes plain that the Islamic Movement is a [Muslim Brotherhood] effort, led by Ikwan [Arabic for Muslim Brotherhood] of America. The Explanatory Movement goes on to explain that the “Movement” is a “settlement process” to establish itself inside the United States and, once established, to undertake a “grand jihad” characterized as a “civilization jihadist” mission that is likewise led by the Muslim Brotherhood. Specifically, the document describes the “settlement process” as a grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and “sabotaging” its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so this it is eliminated…”
This was entered into evidence in a U.S. Federal Court of law. This is proof of sedition. This was never pursued by the DOJ. Instead, the Muslim Brotherhood has strengthened its ties to the Obama Administration, to include subsequent appointments to high level positions within the U.S. government up to and including the military, DHS and intelligence community. You still want to tell me Obama is not guilty of treason?
Next, we have the words of Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf, the cleric leading the building of the ground zero Mosque:
“90 percent of Sharia law is fully compatible – not only compatible – it’s consistent or compatible with American constitutional law and American laws.”
This is a lie. It is a clear practice of the Islamic principle of taqiyya: lying in the advance of Islam.
According to The Reliance of the Traveler, the accepted authority of Sharia law in the majority Sunni sect, under Sharia law:
No freedom of speech
No free press
Nor freedom of artistic expression (there I no art in Islam; it is forbidden)
Cinema, theater and TV are censored
ALL non-Muslims are considered “kafirs” (3rd class citizens subject to the Dhimmi status)
No equal rights for women
ALL secular constitutions must be replaced by the Qur’an and Sharia
Wives can be legally beaten by their husbands for not performing sexually
A Muslim man may have up to 4 wives
Slavery of non-Mulsims is permitted for Muslims
Consumption of alcohol is prohibited
Homosexuality is punishable by death (so are rape and adultery)
Gambling is prohibited
And there is more, none of which is compatible with or in agreement with the ideals and principles of our Declaration of Independence or the individual rights and liberties afforded by our Constitution. . But our government is not telling us about this very real threat. Instead, it is protecting Muslims and helping to further their openly stated goal of bringing down our nation and society. Again, this is the Constitutional definition of treason. So why doesn’t the media expose this threat? Because they have become blinded to the truth by the cancer we call “political correctness.”
From a report titled Sharia, the Threat to America, and Exercise in Competitive Analysis Report of Team B II, including contributors: LtGen William G. “Jerry” Boykin, USA Ret; Lt Gen Edward Soyster, USARet; Ambassador Henry F. Cooper, Chairman of the Board of Directors High Frontier and Chairman Emeritus specializing in Islamic Law; Frank Gaffney, Founder and President of the Center for Security Policy in Washington D.C.; Joseph E Schmitz, 5th Senate confirmed Inspector General of the Department of Defense – and many others:
“Truth – as supported by facts, history and logic – has been vanquished by “politically correct” efforts to impose on this country and its institutions and understanding of Islam that hides the centrality of sharia, jihad, and Islamic supremacism, even though these are defining imperatives that pose an existential threat to Western-style liberty… Judgment, no matter how discerning, is now tarred as “prejudice” and, therefore, a neo-barbarous act to be repressed and suspended all together.”
Sadly, we have several readers on the RNL who confirm the accuracy of this last statement every time they ignorantly defend Islam from the truth of its own history – and now – even the records of a U.S. Federal Court.