The Dangers Of Slicing A Pie Into “Progressively” Smaller Pieces

Ever notice how the liberal left tries to slice the pie into smaller and smaller grievance groups. Justice Scalia decried this practice by saying:

“It’s not up to the courts to invent new minorities that get special protections.”

I think it important to note that Ayn Rand indicated that:

The smallest minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities.

So….you slice the pie into smaller and smaller groups, each with an agenda that is generally the same but there are items where there can be disagreement – because that’s why they slice them that thin, right? To add another demand to the list of demands that liberals place on productive society, correct? Or as Scalia said, to “invent another minority”, one that can be theoretically “oppressed” so the liberals can step in and resolve the oppression with more of somebody else’s money.

Well, here is an example of what happens with grievance groups collide from Kevin Drum at the lefty mag, Mother Jones. Here is where the queer agenda runs head-on into the sour, shriveled, shrill, shrewish leftist Maureen Dowd at the New York Times:

Maureen Dowd has been an embarrassment for a long time. Today, though, she raised her personal bar even further. Here’s a quote in today’s column from an interview she conducted with Chirlane McCray, wife of New York City mayoral candidate Bill de Blasio. It’s about one of de Blasio’s rivals, Christine Quinn:

She’s not the kind of person I feel I can go up to and talk to about issues like taking care of children at a young age and paid sick leave.

Since Quinn is openly gay, this seemed like an obviously insensitive slam, something that Dowd encouraged by spending the next several paragraphs talking about McCray’s and Quinn’s sexual orientation. But here’s what McCray actually said after being specifically asked why Quinn wasn’t catching on among women:

Well, I am a woman, and she is not speaking to the issues I care about, and I think a lot of women feel the same way. I don’t see her speaking to the concerns of women who have to take care of children at a young age or send them to school and after school, paid sick days, workplace; she is not speaking to any of those issues. What can I say? And she’s not accessible, she’s not the kind of person that, I feel, that you can go up and talk to and have a conversation with about those things. And I suspect that other women feel the same thing I’m feeling.

Dowd seems to think she’s the cleverest writer on the planet, but this doesn’t give her a license to twist quotes and elide context to serve her own purposes. Enough is enough. This isn’t the first time Dowd has done this, and the Times needs to put a stop to it.

Now you know how Republicans feel about MoDo, there Kevster.

Talk Amongst Yourselves:

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.