AGENDAS: Global Governance & The Progressive Lexicon
“International Community” = Global Governance
This post is part of a series of posts that illustrate the ‘Spirits and Types’ behind the agendas that drive our world. In this series, I will indirectly illustrate these ‘Spirits and Types’ by showing how they manifest themselves into political agendas. This will be done by highlighting specific figures from our modern world and drawing the connections between their ideology and the historic roots behind their ideas. In this manner, it is hoped that the history of these original ideas will be sufficiently self-evident to allow the reader to draw the proper conclusions about their modern manifestations and the people pushing them. If you are on the side of truth, once you learn the connections, you will see the agenda for what it really is. Now, let me explain what I hear when President Obama says the term “International Community.”
Here is the story:
Obama: I didn’t draw the red line on Syria, world did
“I didn’t set a red line, the world set a red line,” Obama said. “My credibility’s not on the line. The international community’s credibility is on the line. And America and Congress’s credibility’s on the line.”
First, this is a lie. Obama did not ‘misspeak;’ he lied. The Obama Administration did say that they considered use of chemical weapons in Syria would be a ‘red line.”
The Rio Norte Line 
One of my favorite philosophers said, ” I never said most of the things I said.” Yogi Berra
Same guy also said, “I wish I had an answer to that because I’m tired of answering that question.”
Yogi Berra