AGENDAS: The ‘New World Order’
The ‘Conspiracy’ Is Real And It Is Not So ‘New’
This post is interconnected to those dealing with most of the posts under our ‘Social Engineering’ page. I often tell people that, if you will bother to read what they write and have the courtesy to take them at their word, the people who really run the world will tell you what they want and how they intend to do it. I understand that much of the material involved is commonly associated with conspiracy theory. I also understand that this is by design; it serves the purposes of those who wish to remain in the shadows. Still, I am not making any claims to know who these people are, or exactly what they want or how they intend to do it. All I am doing here is presenting some of what they and others have said about their existence. What strikes me as most compelling about the quotes that follow is how far back they go, and how – if we look – we can and do find examples of some of those accused of being part of the ‘conspiracy’ admitting to or confirming the accusations. So, with all this in mind, I present a little of the ‘evidence’ for global conspiracy, starting with the words of a man who claimed to be one of them:
“There does exist and has existed for a generation, an international . . . network which operates, to some extent, in the way the radical right believes the Communists act. In fact, this network, which we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to cooperating with the Communists, or any other groups and frequently does so. I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960s, to examine its papers and secret records. I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to many of its instruments. I have objected, both in the past and recently, to a few of its policies . . . but in general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known.”
–Professor Carroll Quigley, in his book Tragedy and Hope, 1966.
Read the rest, you might be surprised at what you’ll find.
One of the “Round Table Groups” was set up by Cecil Rhodes in the 19th Century……so of course there has been a ‘Global Plan’ …….. and for a Lot Longer than Quigley’s “a generation”.
But the popular Press attack on the very notion of Conspiracy mixes an acceptable Official use of the term with vitriolic ridicule.
Average US Citizen : ” what happened ? Why did they fly Planes into our buildings?”
Gov’t / Press : “A group of “radical Islamists” ….. Conspired to simultaneously try and take down the US economically and at the same time strike a Blow for their “radical” beliefs”
Ave Citizen ;…” so they engaged in a Conspiracy together ?”
Gov’t / Press.. ” Yes..exactly ”
Ave Citizen….” Incredable….and they did this during NORAD war games scenarios and got past the security of the Entire US Intelligence community and the Intelligence agencies of multiple nations….and pulled this off completely on their own as a Conspiracy ”
Gov’t /Press…. ” Yes you got it…exactly”
Ave Citizen :….” It seems like this Conspiracy MUST have had much more far-reaching members or sympathizers outside and inside the US in order to pull this off with the Success they had”.
Gov’t / Press… ” You’re Insane, a Wacko-Bird….a ‘Conpiracy NUT’ spreading stupid Conpiracy Theories !!!! ”
What is the Definition of a *Conspiracy Theory* ?
Anything that doesn’t agree with the official account of an “Event”.
Don,
I am posting this — one subject at a time to help keep it all clear and easy to understand. Most of it will be on The OYL (www.theoyl.com) Just don’t get too far ahead of me, I am writing as fast as my “real” job will allow 🙂
Speaking of conspiracy theories, is it just my computer , or are all comments “down” at the BLAZE?