OK, seriously, stop what you are doing and click on the link below. Take the time to read this story. This is probably closer to the truth than anything our media will dare tell you, and it has the added benefit of tying Obama’s refusal to call terrorism by its name, Libya, Benghazi and now Syria into one neat, tight, easily understood little package. Read this, then decide for yourself:
Did the White House Help Plan the Syrian Chemical Attack?
There is a growing volume of new evidence from numerous sources in the Middle East — mostly affiliated with the Syrian opposition and its sponsors and supporters — which makes a very strong case, based on solid circumstantial evidence, that the August 21, 2013, chemical strike in the Damascus suburbs was indeed a pre-meditated provocation by the Syrian opposition.
The extent of US foreknowledge of this provocation needs further investigation because available data puts the “horror” of the Barack Obama White House in a different and disturbing light.
Read the rest, then tell me if this is treason yet? And, if not, what is the new definition of treason now?
Reblogged this on Catholic Glasses and commented:
Yes
Reblogged this on Brittius.com.
I’ve heard that Syria is on the US hit list. Apparently, there is an agenda. I don’t know if that’s true or just a conspiracy theory. I can try to hunt down the link if you’d like.
It is apparent the agenda of the US Government is to counter Iran by giving the whole of the Arab world over to Sunni control. This also means the US is wiling to support the Muslim Brotherhod, al Qaeda or any other terrorist group to achieve this objective.
All about satisfying the Saudi masters and keeping the petrodollar alive and well.
“All about satisfying the Saudi masters and keeping the petrodollar alive and well.”
BINGO!
And what is the wine of new Babylon by which the merchants of the world become rich and intoxicated?
O-I-L-!
Joe,
Wonder who gave us the big thumbs down?
Lets all worship the created vs the Creator. Babylon rises again.
Men bowing down to other men is quite disgusting in itself. Shows you rather then enlightenment we are in regression. Signs of it are all around us now in our morally decadent lifestyles and government seeking total domination over it’s people’s.
Chhelo,
Let them thumb down anything connected to God. It’s counted blessing for you and I — so long as we are standing on His side where our pat is concerned, that is (which is where I try harder to be every day now)
The Saudi Arabians and the Qataris have been trying to get Assad to build a Pipeline through Syria so they can sell their Natural Gas to Europe………..Assad Has refused. So the Suadi’s said they will pay for the US to act as mercenaries to oust the Assad regime……Obama wants to hand Syria over to the Muslim Brotherhood and Al Qaeda.
THIS is what’s going on there…………..so Sarin gas was given to the Rebels and an EXCUSE was concocted to achieve these two goals by the US Bombing Assad because he was winning against the Rebels…………..THAT’S why the EU has been sidnaling its positive respose to Bombing.
None of these people care about children………least of all Christian Children who’ve been killed for two years .
Just a simple question whose answer might shed light on O’s action in the Middle East. Was/Is O a Sunni or a Shia?
Given where he was raised and lived as a child, and the fact that they comprise nearly 80%+ of all Muslims, I’d bet Sunni — but I don’t know for sure.
Here’s a clue, though. Shi’a and Sunni tend to kill each other on sight. There was a story about the Shi’a doing this in Egypt just last week: stopped a convoy and, if the drivers were Sunni, BANG!
Since Mr Prez kissed the ring of the Saudi Prince, I’d go with Sunni.
And this whole Syria thing reeks of Saudi oil . Didn’t I read of a saudi plan to pipe oil through Syria to Europe. And didn’t Assad say ,NO! Not trying too hard for a conspiratorial slant , but somethin’s rotten in Denmark.
Ralph,
Yes, I posted on this. Bad news, to be sure.