OK, seriously, stop what you are doing and click on the link below. Take the time to read this story. This is probably closer to the truth than anything our media will dare tell you, and it has the added benefit of tying Obama’s refusal to call terrorism by its name, Libya, Benghazi and now Syria into one neat, tight, easily understood little package. Read this, then decide for yourself:
There is a growing volume of new evidence from numerous sources in the Middle East — mostly affiliated with the Syrian opposition and its sponsors and supporters — which makes a very strong case, based on solid circumstantial evidence, that the August 21, 2013, chemical strike in the Damascus suburbs was indeed a pre-meditated provocation by the Syrian opposition.
The extent of US foreknowledge of this provocation needs further investigation because available data puts the “horror” of the Barack Obama White House in a different and disturbing light.
Read the rest, then tell me if this is treason yet? And, if not, what is the new definition of treason now?