Received the following from an email buddy………..

The below scenario is so believable it’s scary. I don’t know what it would take to arouse the masses, but not much.

What’s even more troubling is what would it take to arouse our Country’s Patriots into becoming law breaking rebels, and a cohesive force that would retake our Constitutional Gov’t?

Those of us with our eyes open have been following the Obama play since long before he entered the White House and we all knew that he was a very bad actor.

I mistakenly thought he was an “empty suit” and had no idea that he was capable of engineering and pulling off the biggest heist in human history! His systematic purge of our military leadership (including CIA) neutralized any “Seven Days In May” threat and he rendered our nation’s electoral process null and void by defeating a presidential candidate (post Benghazi) who was right out of central casting. I can’t think of anyone who was or is more qualified for the oval office than Mitt Romney. We need a better solution to this situation.

A Washington friend of mine forwarded the “Purge Theory” below.

When I asked my colleague, an Army Colonel, why he thinks Obama is doing this, the reply I received from this life-long soldier and Army leader shocked me.
Paraphrasing him, this is what he told me in a nutshell.

He said most branches of the service routinely engage in war “games” and come up with strategies and tactics on how to handle every type of military conflict and scenario that can be imagined. One of the big new battle scenarios being actively discussed in the military recently is how to handle civil unrest in the U.S. and fighting in the streets. What will the Army do if called in to fight armed civilians in the streets of the United States? How will that urban warfare be conducted? Will troops be able to fire upon other American citizens when they have taken an oath to protect American citizens?

He said many in the military are discussing the very real possibility that Obama will attempt to stay in office beyond two terms. It’s speculated that Obama will do this by declaring a state of martial law. The easiest way to declare martial law is when there is massive civil unrest and riots throughout the U.S. Thus, it is believed that Obama, and his regime, will intentionally create a situation of massive civil unrest. Some believe he has already started to implement that strategy by forcing Obamacare on everyone (when the populace did not ask for it and less than 300 people in power voted for it). Perhaps the Administration is not too concerned over the totally dysfunctional Obamacare website and the additional fact that millions will be dropped from their existing insurance policies which they already had and liked. The Administration may not care if getting health care becomes more difficult and more expensive because it is all leading toward civil unrest. It is believed by some that Obamacare will only get worse and worse, and then in 2 to 3 years when people have a very difficult time getting medical treatment for themselves or their loved ones, people will be enraged.

Moreover, it is being speculated that around the same time when the frustration levels over Obamacare are hitting a critical point in 2 to 3 years, there will be a “glitch” in the welfare payment (or EBT) payment system. The tens of millions who rely on EBT handouts to sustain themselves will be cut off. The overwhelming majority of the EBT recipients are Black. The Obama regime will then blame the “glitch” on the Republicans who froze government spending which “forced” Obama to suspension of EBT payments. (Obama will intentionally drive spending up and up uncontrolled knowing full well that one day the Republicans will be backed into a corner and finally vote for a freeze in spending.) Obama will create heightened racial tension by telling everyone that the White Republicans are racially motivated and did this to hurt the Black community. This manufactured racial tension, combined with growing tensions over the then-collapsing medical coverage due to Obamacare, will result in race wars and civil unrest. People will take to the streets.

By the way, my colleague, the Army Colonel, who is telling me all this, is Black. He specifically commented, and outwardly expressed his embarrassment, about how Blacks have become so dependent and enslaved by the welfare system and the Democrats that it would be very easy to create civil unrest and race wars merely by cutting off, or dramatically hindering, EBT payments for only a month or so. He believes that most Blacks, who have a misguided sense of entitlement, will then take to looting stores and rioting.

Once the race wars, civil unrest, and violence becomes pervasive throughout the U.S., Obama will declare martial law and take over. Elections can, and will, be postponed under martial law.

My colleague noted that this possibility is clearly being analyzed and discussed inside the military because such a martial law strategy is nothing new. Tyrannical and dictatorial leaders in the past have done the martial law strategy many times. He noted that dictators such as Stalin, Mussolini, and Hitler did basically the same thing. He went on to say that one of the most recent examples of this strategy was when Marcos declared martial law in the Philippines from 1972-1981 due to civil unrest. The Philippines had democratic elections up until that time. When martial law was declared, the Philippine constitution was suspended, its Congress dissolved, all elections were suspended, and Marcos remained in power for years beyond his elected term. The alleged “terrorist bombings” that occurred in the Philippines, which lead to Marcos declaring martial law, have always been questioned and never proven to be the acts of actual terrorists.

He concluded by saying that many believe this is the real reason behind the purgings of military generals. The older members of the military, and especially its generals and leaders, tend to be more conservative and they believe in the Constitution – and following the Constitution. Thus, a tyrant and dictator needs to get rid of these military leaders before a state of martial law is declared if the rising dictator wants the military to follow along and do what the dictator says. Due to the loss of many experienced military leaders the past few years, the military is now being run and guided more and more by younger, inexperienced leaders. The type who won’t really know what to do if martial law was declared. Moreover, he noted that there is a growing mind-set throughout the military now that every soldier needs to keep quiet and just follow along with what Obama says and wants to do or you will be fired and your military career ruined. Again, I was told this is nothing new since removing strong military leaders in advance of declaring martial law is a historically-proven element of a rising tyrant and dictator.

6 thoughts on “Hmmmmmmmmm……………………..

  1. If you look at and study history, that is generally how tyrant, dictators, and Communists come into power.

    As a group of 13 EOD Officers (with over 10-12 years experence in Command) attending a class in the mid to late 1970s, having a young JAG officers tell us that “The Posse Comitatus Act is whatever we say it is”, when we informed him that he was incorrect in that, you can not use U.S. Military Forces to perform civilian Police services, just because the post commander wanted to. We felt that we had a good idea what the law was as we dealt with the Posse Comitatus Act all the time while working with the local police when responding to Bomb threats and IEDs in CONUS. We then knew “WE” have a problem……So the ground work it started a long time ago.

  2. Perhaps the retired Constitutionalists should find like-minded senior officers and establish their own network within the active-duty corps, keep in touch with some Rangers and Seals, and prepare to act as leaders and advisors to those who are likely to be ordered into domestic combat. When orders are coming from an incompetent Commander-in-chief the combatants may be receptive to modifications to their rules of engagement.

    • Going to have to do something because the Army back in 2005ish stopped teaching the troops what is an “illegal order” vs a legal order. I figure the reason is so that they will just “follow orders” without thinking if it is right or wrong. They are conditioned to believe that any order given by the chain of command is “LEGAL”. As in shooting unarmed civilians, stopping and arresting just because they are the Military and can, ect. They have not learned history from WWII that “I was just following orders” is not a legal defense in court. I truely feel sorry for those troops who are mislead and misinformed by their Officers and NCOs, they deserve better.

  3. ^ Yes , yes. He has inadvertently given the good guys the best of the best. (Why do I feel we may need them?)

    Interesting, Dusty, that you post this on the same day I make a comment on a Black Friday homicide: This is bad? All hell would break loose with an EBT blunder. That’s what I said, or something to that effect…….. Don’t know if people would believe me, but I reckon if they’re so desperate to get their Turbo Man, they’re even more so when it comes to food. As I understand, it is one bank. That would be easy as pie to shut down. Am I wrong?

Talk Amongst Yourselves:

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.