No-Fault Progressivism

One thing that I always found both aggravating and curious during both of the George W. Bush administrations was how his opposition and the media seemed intent on picking every nit and prying on every scab, no matter the level of importance. The constant badgering of the “progressives” and their enabling “journalists” for Bush to admit mistakes and offer apologies to the American people were part and parcel of every presidential press conference Bush held from January of 2001 to January of 2009.

Some of the younger folks won’t remember it but this type of acidic confrontation is commonplace during Republican administrations – Reagan had Sam Donaldson and George W. Bush had the old anti-Semitic crone, Helen Thomas.

But you don’t hear those same demands of the Obama regime today.

The reason isn’t what you think – it isn’t hypocrisy or bias.

Of course those doing it are hypocrites and are biased but it is truly because “Progressives” believe that they are superior simply because they are “progressives”.

Republicans from Reagan to Bush II have been expected to admit fault as proof that conservatism and its slightly more left leaning/big government variant, compassionate conservatism, are inferior to the “progressive” ideology practiced by the Democrats and their leftist kin.

For you see, “progressivism” can never actually win, it only “wins” if the other side admits that it lost. For example, once George H.W. Bush wrongly admitted that his “Read my lips, no new taxes” was a mistake by raising taxes in a “grand bargain” with the Democrats, the “progressives” seized on that admission as evidence that moderate conservatism was a failure, packaged and sold that meme to the people and “Voila!”, we got two terms of Bill Clinton.

Even in the face of such a massive failure as Obamacare – a failure by their metrics, not by conservative reckoning – there will never be an admission or a course correction. What President Obama has done with all the delays and the material changes in the law by executive fiat are not changes for the better, they are just designed to delay the inevitable collapse of the program and the insurance industry until after he leaves office in 2016. The only reason that there are no alterations in that outcome is the absolute and total inability for a “progressive” to conceive that anything they do could be wrong or a failure.

In the mind of a “progressive”, their ideology has never failed. “Progressivism” is always held in a perpetual state of limbo with its success just out of reach – it just has never been implemented correctly, they have never had enough power, people just aren’t taxed enough, government has never spent enough to make it successful or all of the above are true.

Charles Kessler, Editor of the Claremont Review of Books, wrote about this in the January issue of the Hillsdale College newsletter, Imprimis:

“Liberal impatience with partisanship—that is, with people who oppose their plans—arises from the fact that in contemporary liberalism, there is no publicly acknowledged right of revolution. That may seem like a strange thing to say, but if one looks at some of the political theorists who were most important to modern or statist liberal- ism—Kant and Hegel in Germany, say,  or Woodrow Wilson here in the United States—they are usually quite explicit in rejecting a right of revolution. In their view, a people always has in the long run the government it deserves. So there’s no right of the people to “abolish,” as the Declaration of Independence pro- claims, the prevailing form of government and substitute a better one.  In particular, there is no conceivable right to overturn contemporary liberalism itself; as liberals today are so fond of saying, there is no turning back the clock.”

“Progressivism” shares many traits with radical Islam and the terrorists who practice it. It is asymmetrical, it knows no borders, it excludes any possibility that it could be misunderstood by its followers and it is antithetical to its professed core beliefs. As much as radical Islam prosecutes crimes against God as it proclaims “Allah Akbar!”, “progressivism” eschews true progress and embraces regressive tendencies – among them, an apparent desire to devolve the human race.

“Progressivism” cannot be negotiated with any more than one can negotiate with the Taliban, al Qaeda or Jemaah Islamiya, it – and they – can only be destroyed.

5 thoughts on “No-Fault Progressivism

  1. Agree 100 % with this post.

    I would only add that the other reason is that the Left….Progressives ( including GOP progressivers) are full of Hate….and violent speech and action………… Mitch McConnell’s recent call for “Unity” at CPAC….then a day later in the NYT saying he and his Cronies will “Crush” Conservatives and the Tea Party is a perfect window into their thinking ….

  2. We got two terms of Bil Clinton because: 1. The Republicans didn’t put up decent conservative candidates, and 2. Ross Perot. It wasn’t because Bush I said “read my lips”. There might have been a third reason for Clinton too; the women vote. Just as JFK won because the women fell in love with his good looks so to did they vote for Bill Clinton.

    • True enough Gone, about the Women-folk and their perpetual “Hormone” votes.

      BUT…..Kennedy only really won because of Mob influence in Chicago and other sites “bringing” in the vote as a favor to Jack’s Father Joe Kennedy ( and even with Mafia influence Kennedy ony won witha slim margin )…….. Just like LBJ and the famous box 13 in texas in the early 1940’s ( Texas Mobsters stealing ballots and filling them with 100% Lyndon Votes ) ….and what was attempted in Athens Tenn. in 1946 ( but was stopped bty returning WWII Vets).

      The pattern of Stolen Votes in the Democrat Party is rampant……and 2012 may have been the MOTHER_LODE of a Stolen Denocrat election !! ……….. Large parts of Ohio and Pennsylvania with not a Single Romney Vote.

Talk Amongst Yourselves:

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.