Wearing the Scarlet “C”

White privilege, microaggression and racism! Oh, my!

jewish_star_350Back last July, Father Michael Pfleger noted that his belief that racism is in America’s DNA – not really a new idea – Time magazine pitched that in the heat of the election season in October of 2007 . MSNBC’s version of Pajama Boy, Chris Hayes, says that conservative political views should disqualify people from office. Jonathan Capehart of the Washington Post says that tolerance only applies if a person agrees with the “progressive” agenda.

But now comes the ribbon that ties it all together in a neat little bow.

Josh Marshall of Talking Points Memo writes that not only are you racist, ANY opposition to ANY Democrat is based on racism and therefore invalid. Doesn’t matter what race or ethnicity, opposition to or otherwise impeding the “progress” of the “progressive” agenda is based on nothing but irrational hatred.

What a crock.

It couldn’t possibly be that Obama and Clinton (and his wife) all share a commonality – they are statists. It couldn’t be that every Democrat policy contains a provision for growing state power over the individual. It couldn’t be that these statist programs are failures.

No, that couldn’t be that – because if it were, that might mean that the left would have to debate their policies based on whether they actually work or not.

Don’t want to do that? Just try to redefine your opposition as sub-human, knuckle-dragging troglodytes, incapable of reason and motivated by their four basic needs – food, clothing, shelter and racism.

Apparently those on the American political left have the three second recall of a goldfish – since they can’t remember the vitriol (personal and political) hurled (and still hurled) at Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush. While Reagan was a lying, “amiable dunce”, Bush was simply a lying dunce (despite having better collegiate grades than ManBearPig).

The Democrats are treading a dangerous path. The are about a half-step away from declaring any opposition as enemies of the state and forcing anyone with conservative leaning tendencies and views to have a large scarlet “C” sewn onto their clothing. The Democrats are indulging in fantasies of Hitleresque style pogroms against classic liberalism.

In In 1919, Adolph Hitler penned a letter to a a Herr Adolf Gemlich. This letter is recorded as his first written expression regarding the “Jewish problem”. In it, he wrote:

“Through thousands of years of the closest kind of inbreeding, Jews in general have maintained their race nazileafletand their peculiarities far more distinctly than many of the peoples among whom they have lived. And thus comes the fact that there lives amongst us a non­ German, alien race which neither wishes nor is able to sacrifice its racial character or to deny its feeling, thinking, and striving. Nevertheless, it possesses all the political rights we do. If the ethos of the Jews is revealed in the purely material realm, it is even clearer in their thinking and striving. Their dance around the golden calf is becoming a merciless struggle for all those possessions we prize most highly on earth.
The value of the individual is no longer decided by his character or by the significance of his achievements for the totality but exclusively by the size of his fortune, by his money.

The loftiness of a nation is no longer to be measured by the sum of its moral and spiritual powers, but rather by the wealth of its material possessions…

In his effects and consequences he is like a racial tuberculosis of the nations.

The deduction from all this is the following: an antisemitism based on purely emotional grounds will find its ultimate expression in the form of the pogrom. An antisemitism based on reason, however, must lead to systematic legal combating and elimination of the privileges of the Jews, that which distinguishes the Jews from the other aliens who live among us (an Aliens Law). The ultimate objective [of such legislation] must, however, be the irrevocable removal of the Jews in general.

For both these ends a government of national strength, not of national weakness, is necessary.”

holocaust2-405x248The “progressives” never hesitate to frame conservatives as Nazis (while ignoring that they were the National SOCIALIST German Workers Party). In reality, “progressive” shills like Josh Marshall, Chris Hayes, Jonathan Capehart, Father Pfleger, the so called “academicians” who are pushing the idea of “white privilege” and every Democrat who claims that opposition to Obama is based on nothing but racism are all guilty of promoting the same desired end result against their opposition as Hitler’s “antisemitism of reason” produced against European Jews.
It seems that while not every “progressive” is a Democrat, every Democrat is a “progressive”. In earlier times, I have called these people dangerous. I have been reluctant to call them evil – but given that they are covertly and overtly supporting pogroms aimed at the extinction of classic liberalism by any means necessary, I don’t have to define them as evil.

They are doing a mighty fine job of that on their own.

7 thoughts on “Wearing the Scarlet “C”

  1. I learned many years ago in the SF Bay Area that I would never be allowed to criticize how my city or state was being run because of my race. An Oakland Tribune writer told me that racism was “endemic to our culture” and because of that nothing I said could ever be considered. I was a racist…..period. Didn’t matter how I was raised, didn’t matter what I actually thought, didn’t matter that my ancestors were abolitionists because my skin was white and that sealed my fate. They made clear people would no longer be judged by the content of their character, but only by the color of their skin. It was abhorrent then and it is abhorrent now.

    Utah, if our country is going to survive we must return to judging people based on their actions and not the color of their skin.

    • I think most people do but it is easier for the left to excuse their failures and shield their idols from criticism by framing their opposition as irrational and immoral.

    • David Horowitz had and has the “Oakland Scene” down pat.

      You were another victim of the East Bay/Bay Area racist monster that has devoured Northern Calif.

  2. The left is having to face a REAL problem with their “playing the race-card”. More and more black Americans are realizing what a screw-up OWEbozo is for the blacks of America. Blacks that are business owners and managers are seeing how hard it is to operate under his statist rules and the blacks in the workforce are realizing that their life isn’t a bit better since he took over the throne.

  3. The Scarlet C of Conservatism: Wanting to conserve the Constitution with its’ Bill of Rights protecting the Individuals from the Tribalists. A nation of Laws or a MobOcracy of Men where 51% vote to eat the minority. They screech for equality of outcome, while ignoring the injustice of enslaving the worker to the moocher.

Talk Amongst Yourselves:

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.