Back in the USSR

kgb-alpha-snatches-tolkachevObama’s announcement yesterday about his unilateral action on gun control was filled with even more lies than tears…but in all fairness, like most of his pronouncements it wasn’t designed to be factual.

It was an example of progressive “signalling” – an announcement by a progressive authority about what was proper to believe and license to attack those who don’t share that same “proper” frame of mind. Given the vitriol and blind attacks I have read coming from the usual leftist suspects over the past 24 hours, it appears that the message was received. Chuckie “Where’s the Camera?” Schumer’s pet progressive rag – the New York Daily News – sure got it, coming out this morning with pictures of Fiorina, Cruz, Paul Ryan and Rubio on the front page under the heading “The Party of Pro-Death.”

In truth, when viewed in the context of the problem he professes to want to solve, most of what Obama proselytized about was nothingness – meaningless symbolism. Related to “mass shootings” and the supposed epidemic of “gun violence”, it was all non sequitur because his moves only increase restrictions on legal gun purchases when statistics show that only 0.7% of criminals got weapons at a gun show (Emily Miller has done some very good reporting on this).

What disturbs me most about Obama’s move is the aspect that allows just about anyone to be accused of being mentally ill in order to take away a firearm or to prohibit the purchase of one. Progressives have a penchant for calling anyone who disagrees with their pathological need for totalitarianism “crazy”. The People’s Republic of California just enacted a statute that allows the confiscation of firearms without probable cause based on nothing but an accusation. A favorite tactic of the proglodytes in open carry states is to call 911 because they see a gun and feel afraid (the idiocy of this is that gun that can be seen on a law-abiding owner’s hip is far less likely to cause harm than the weapon hidden in some thug’s waistband).

This trend to compromise rights and freedoms based on arbitrary standards of “mental illness” is not new. It all seems so…well, all too Soviet:

“Over the course of its 69-year history, the Soviet Union was notorious for its heavy-handed suppression of political dissent — most infamously through its use of the Siberian GULAGs. But it was during the 1960s and 1970s that the Communist Party took their intolerance for ideological deviance to extremes by diagnosing and institutionalizing so-called counterrevolutionaries with mental illness. It was a frightening episode in Soviet history in which perfectly healthy citizens could be deemed psychotic simply on account of their political views.

And indeed, what better way to deal with activists and naysayers than to diagnose them as being mentally unstable. Dissenters, who were often seen as both a burden and a threat to the system, could be easily discredited and detained.”

True enough. There can be no doubt that there are those who truly suffer mental conditions that should preclude them from possessing a firearm but the progressive left has never really considered mental illness as a “get out of jail free card” for pretty much anything – they are the first to use mental illness as and escape hatch for pretty much any sort of punishment or discrimination. They are focused on “mainstreaming” mentally ill to prevent the stigma of their conditions, to the point that HIPAA regulations prevent the disclosure of conditions but gun owners will not have those sort of protections.


11 thoughts on “Back in the USSR

  1. Thank you for that clarion call of truth to image.
    As you well know, one has only to compare the rise of Soviet Russia, to the left’s tactics.They have groomed this usurper to not be a “Parallel” but a Die cast repeat.
    A quick glance at the History books we grew up with confirms this road ends at a tall wall pocked-marked with bullet holes. And a LONG shallow trench besides.
    What was that H.G. Weiis story of the sighted man in the land of the blind?
    (I think you know it all too well!)

    Happy New Years Utah!

  2. If what the idiot has decided to throw on our plate could have prevented EVEN ONE of the killings that made him cry, you would think that he would have used the examples in his stupid spiel. Thinking back as far as I can remember, I don’t see any of America’s past killers being unable to carry out their notoriety seeking murders if these new rules were already in effect before I was born.

  3. Obama has in essence “weaponized” our Doctors against us, and “weaponized” Psychiatry just as the Soviets did.

    And as “fjfo” said above it is nothing more than a Die cast repeat” of the Soviet/Marxist model. With proper education this should be an Easy win to defeat. But this is exactly why the American Marxist ( called Progressives) attacked the School System first starting in the late 1890s and into 1930.

    • BTW, Don, that’s Frank J Fisher, 0311 (Rifleman)
      But YOU can call me “fjf0”, as long as I don’t get any angry phone calls from you’re wife,
      (I’m wearing carhartts, if she asks) 🙂

      • Well you see now that’s problematic. I have a couple of Kick-ass Carhartt coats, but she only likes the kind of Carhartts she buys for me to wear…..semi form-fitting shirts and such.

        Women….go figure.

Talk Amongst Yourselves:

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.