Once More Into the Breach

ar15-tw-m15-ruger-682x382.1426183524Virtue signaling. I have written of this before. It is simply a way the progressive left sends messages to the other members of their tribe that the messenger belongs, they are one of the tribe. The screeching of the anti-gun harpies after any major event involving a gun after years long silence over the slow motion carnage in a major city like Chicago completely destroys any credibility they have.

First, let’s settle on a definition – the “assault weapons” the progressive beta males and alpha females desire to ban are actually rifles, aka “long guns”, that are virtually indistinguishable from other semi-automatic rifles in rate of fire or lethality. Actually, the most popular class, the M-16 look alike AR-15, is chambered in the military 5.56 mm round which is the same as the non-military .223 caliber. This caliber is not sufficiently lethal for big game and in most cases, is banned from use in hunting moose, elk or some larger animals.

So now that we have established that these “assault weapons” are rifles, let’s look at a few documented facts from some credible sources that progressives like – government agencies, shall we?

First, under the Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act, H.R.3355, 103rd Congress (1993-1994) (aka the Assault Weapons Ban of 1994), the definition of “semiautomatic assault weapon” included specific semi-automatic firearm models by name, and other semi-automatic firearms that possessed two or more from a set of certain features – as in being able to accept detachable magazines and two or more of the following:

  • Folding or telescoping stock
  • Pistol grip
  • Bayonet mount
  • Flash suppressor, or threaded barrel designed to accommodate one
  • Grenade launcher mount

None of which increased the lethality of the weapon – except the grenade launcher – but since public ownership of grenades have been banned since 1934, all that stuff is pretty much cosmetic.

Next, from the FBI’s Uniform Crime Statistics, Expanded Homicide Data Table 8, we find

160614_CRIME_Sig-Sauer-MCX.jpg.CROP.promovar-mediumlarge

Sig Sauer MCX

that the total deaths from all rifles (including those not identified as an “assault weapon”) totaled 248 victims in 2014 (latest year data is available). This data table also shows a decrease in victims in this category every year since 2010 from 367 to 248, a one third decrease. Additionally, from the same database, we find that the total number of homicides involving ALL firearms was 8,124 in 2014. Also from the CDC mortality tables, suicide by firearm account for 25,512 deaths for a total death by firearms in 2014 of 33,636.

Lastly, from the Centers for Disease Control, we find that drug overdoses are the leading cause of accidental death in the US, with 47,055 lethal drug overdoses in 2014. Opioid addiction is driving this epidemic, with 18,893 overdose deaths related to prescription pain relievers, and 10,574 overdose deaths related to heroin in 2014.

So from this data, it seems clear that another ban of “assault weapons” might result in reducing the total number of firearms deaths by 0.74%. I say “might” because a ban would be for the purchase of new weapons and not the ownership of existing weapons.

stock_heroin-injectionBut what about drug overdoses? Since 46,807 more people died as a result of drug overdoses than were killed by rifles (including “assault weapons”), would it not make more sense to ban drugs? Oh, wait…drugs are some of the most regulated substances on the face of the earth. As a matter of fact, the 47,000 overdoses include almost 19,000 deaths from prescription drugs (that’s 40% of the overdose deaths). Why are the progressives not rioting in the streets over drug deaths?

Because it isn’t about death at all. It is about a cynical capitalization of tragedy for political gain.

One thing I have learned over my career is that in negotiations, what the other side fears you will do is not about what you would do, it is based on what they would do in a given circumstance. What this is about is projection, they fear guns not because what you might do but what they would do. They would use any method to resist your control, so they want to remove any possibility for you to resist theirs. It is about creating an emotional appeal to the weak and a weak minded useful idiot majority to remove the last barrier to protecting the Constitution and the liberty it provides. Progressives are never serious about preserving life, only about preserving their morbid grasp on power.

Advertisements

11 thoughts on “Once More Into the Breach

  1. But….but….It doesn’t matter……………. they’re all BLACK guns !!!

    Spot on ……. Fantastic last paragraph. Well beyond what the average “smarter” Liberal-socialist can understand.

  2. “Because it isn’t about death at all. It is about a cynical capitalization of tragedy for political gain.”

    It is far more sinister than just political gain. It is really their desire to kill anyone that opposes them. Don’t think for one moment BHO or HC would not line their opponents up against a wall or in front of a ditch and have their minions do the dirty work. Genicide of the opposition in their mind is only eliminating the wretched pawns that want to cling to their Bibles and firearms. How dare we don’t bow down to Jesebel!

    The election of HC will open Pandora’s Box and the stench that it will release will sicken the USA with a terminal illness.

  3. As you can see by the break down, the Sig Sauer MCX semi-automatic is nearly identical to it’s AR-15 counterpart save one thing — it is gas piston operated, which you can also get in AR-15s, but look closer and you see that the upper receiver is a bit different, and then there’s the buttostock ….

    The buffer and gas tube is gone. SIG replaced them with a short stroke gas piston and a compact recoil system contained completely within the upper receiver. And that’s just about it.

    Despite all it’s fancy modularity, the MCX remains a “semi automatic”, and that my friends makes it not an assault rifle.

    The mil-spec version however is an assault rifle, and this terrorist would not have had access to the mil-spec version of the MCX.

    Edit note: Why can I not upload a picture????

    You folks will just have to go look up a disassembled MCX for yourselves. Sorry about that.

  4. Gunaphobes are all insane. I mean, they have absolutely ZERO understanding of firearms, yet they presume to know which weapon is deadlier than the next. Folks, I can tell you with absolute certainty that you can have a fully automatic machine gun with 500 rounds, and I’ll take my AR-15 with 30 rounds and I will be MUCH more deadly than you (that is, unless we’ve had the same training, of course 😉 ).

    It is ALWAYS the person that is the threat, NEVER the thing — ALWAYS!

  5. Oh my goodness! Impressive article dude! Thanks, However I
    am having problems with your RSS. I don’t understand the reason why I am unable to
    subscribe to it. Is there anyone else getting the same RSS issues?
    Anyone who knows the answer will you kindly respond? Thanx!!

Talk Amongst Yourselves:

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s