PRINCIPLES OF NATURAL LAW: You are either Pro TEA Party, or You are Pro Tyranny (there’s no ‘middle ground’ on this issue)
Are you Pro TEA Party or Pro Tyranny, Slavery/Indentured Servitude, Lawlessness and Licentiousness? Yes, I understand that it is fallacious to argue “You’re either for me or against me” — except when there are only two sides to an issue. You can either be for liberty or control; for the law or lawlessness; for slavery or servitude; for morality of licentiousness. You cannot be ‘neutral’ on these issues. There is no “I support the law and lawlessness at the same time.” By definition, such a position is lawlessness — especially when we are discussing Natural Law (as we are now). So, when it comes to the TEA Party agenda, which are you: for them, or for Tyranny, Slavery, Lawlessness and Licentiousness? Think I am wrong? Then read this post and then tell me if you still think I’m wrong. … Continue reading →
4 thoughts on “Are You TEA Party or Tyrant (there is no middle ground)?”
Reblogged this on A Conservative Christian Man.
Tea Party here !
Good you linked to Concord. Both the site and the metaphor.
The name and metaphor were intentional. In my mind, they are one-in-the-same